!UUYziobKGGxpovWyAN:nixos.org

Robotnix

213 Members
Build Android (AOSP) using Nix | https://github.com/danielfullmer/robotnix68 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
25 Nov 2024
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrif you read the past few days' chatter, those that got built for and installed are likely those that fit your criteria...17:12:26
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr ... but also I would presume that any that are currently well-supported by LineageOS in one of the supported release are almost just as likely to work well 17:13:00
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr(IIRC the previously mentioned phones were a fairphone, 4 IIRC? and oneplus 5?(T?))17:13:41
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr or uh... hmmm... lol https://github.com/nix-community/robotnix/blob/master/flavors/lineageos/supported_devices.toml 17:14:47
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr ah right, instantnoodle is oneplus 8 https://github.com/nix-community/robotnix/pull/258 17:15:27
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr *

ah right, instantnoodle is oneplus 8

17:15:38
@oak:universumi.fioakDepends on what you want to run, I'd say if you want to run LineageOS then those devices supported by LineageOS are easy go21:00:13
@oak:universumi.fioakIf I'd buy a new Android phone right now, I'd probably go for 256GB model of Pixel 9 Pro21:00:39
@oak:universumi.fioakI have instantnoodlep which is OnePlus 8 Pro, it's also a bit old at this point, the last officially supported update came out few months ago. (OnePlus usually supports their devices for 4 years.) Then I used my even older OnePlus 5T (dumpling) as a test phone, even that seems to run LineageOS 21. But I think that's because that LineageOS developer luk1337 puts quite much effort to supporting those devices21:03:52
@oak:universumi.fioakhttps://github.com/melontini/bootloader-unlock-wall-of-shame21:06:14
@oak:universumi.fioakWhat is cool about Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 is that they support the new ARM Memory Tagging Extensions21:10:25
@oak:universumi.fioakhttps://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2023/11/first-handset-with-mte-on-market.html21:13:35
26 Nov 2024
@ryantrinkle:matrix.orgryantrinkle samueldr: oak Thanks for the info! 14:45:40
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.org joined the room.20:40:37
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.orgHi. Anyone here know how to compare pvmfw.img between two AOSP (Android 15) builds? It is an unusual file structure and I don't know how to unpack this before comparing with diffoscope.20:41:42
@atemu12:matrix.orgatemu12 What is the file type? 20:42:25
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.org

pvmfw.img is an Android boot image (according to the file command). The unpack_bootimg.py from AOSP can unpack it, but the "kernel" file inside of it has just "data" as its file type.

20:44:55
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.org
$ file pvmfw.img.unpacked/* 
kernel:  data
ramdisk: empty
20:49:37
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.orgIt's a really weird couple of files and I really don't know how to make diffoscope compare them properly.20:51:38
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.org

The pvmfw.img file itself has this type:

$ file pvmfw.img
pvmfw.img: Android bootimg, kernel
20:53:22
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.orgMaybe I should try checking if platform/build/+/master/tools/extract_kernel.py can make some sense out of it.20:54:16
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.orgYeah, not even AOSP's extract_kernel.py can make some sense out of pvmfw.img.unpacked/kernel.21:06:33
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.org *

Yeah, not even AOSP's extract_kernel.py can make some sense out of pvmfw.img.unpacked/kernel.

21:06:41
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.org *

Maybe I should try checking if platform/build/+/master/tools/extract_kernel.py can make some sense out of it.

21:06:48
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.org

Aside from this, I've also used unpack_bootimg.pyto unpack the boot.img. That one has a perfectly normal ARM64 kernel image, but diffoscope still shows a large diff when comparing two builds of the same boot.img.unpacked/kernel. Do I need to preprocess this kernel image somehow before comparing? Not sure if I need to strip signatures from the image or how to do this, by the way.

21:14:19
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.org *

Aside from this, I've also used unpack_bootimg.py to unpack the boot.img. That one has a perfectly normal ARM64 kernel image, but diffoscope still shows a large diff when comparing two builds of the same boot.img.unpacked/kernel. Do I need to preprocess this kernel image somehow before comparing? Not sure if I need to strip signatures from the image or how to do this, by the way.

21:14:29
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr

jack: when I hit a weird filetype, especially when it's likely others have it it, searching its filename in github code search helps... when you know how to use it, which is non-obvious: use a regex to search

21:14:54
@jack:unredacted.org@jack:unredacted.org
In reply to @samueldr:matrix.org

jack: when I hit a weird filetype, especially when it's likely others have it it, searching its filename in github code search helps... when you know how to use it, which is non-obvious: use a regex to search

That's a good idea. Thanks.
21:15:32
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr given I see Protected VM firmware image along it, maybe that's not "just" a linux kernel 21:16:05
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldreven though it's packaged within the "container" of an android boot image21:16:24

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6