!UUYziobKGGxpovWyAN:nixos.org

Robotnix

244 Members
Build Android (AOSP) using Nix | https://github.com/danielfullmer/robotnix75 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
15 Aug 2021
@jcie74:matrix.orgpie_oh good23:43:54
16 Aug 2021
@jcie74:matrix.orgpie_ danielrf: how do/did you iterate with 10 hour build timeS? 00:23:01
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrf pie_: at the rate of 1-2 builds per day haha 00:26:50
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfit was painful00:26:52
@jcie74:matrix.orgpie_i had that with a much smaller project x)00:27:09
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrwhen I was toying with robotnix it was a one try per evening thing00:27:27
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrthough funnily enough my last two contributions take far less time00:27:48
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr(TWRP, anbox)00:27:57
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrf samueldr: btw, I'm currently working on building waydroid 00:28:59
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrneat00:29:05
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrlast I looked I couldn't find it lol00:29:12
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfI haven't looked into the host-side at all yet, but just wanted to see if I could get the guest to build in robotnix00:29:22
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrthough the not-neat part is AFAIUI it totally won't work on X11 :(00:29:24
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrand something I'm not sure about, whether it will work with hardware without accelerated graphics00:29:56
@jcie74:matrix.orgpie_at the cost of some flexibility apparently i could just use androids build in "hci snoop" functionaity01:58:43
@jcie74:matrix.orgpie_ * at the cost of some flexibility apparently i could just use androids built in "hci snoop" functionaity01:58:51
@philipp:xndr.dephilippOoooh! I am very interested in waydroid, pretty much exactly what I was looking for but the decided to just go classic qemu virtualisation for the time being.09:48:57
17 Aug 2021
@jcie74:matrix.orgpie_ danielrf: are you willing to maybe make some issues on the issue tracker that i can point the summer of nix people at for thngs id like to work on? 09:03:20
@jcie74:matrix.orgpie_i could of course do it myself but i think you might be able to write more coherently09:03:38
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrf pie_: Sure, I wrote up some issues summarizing what I got from our earlier conversation: #115, #116, and #117 19:17:10
@jcie74:matrix.orgpie_thanks19:17:21
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfFeel free to add any other details if I've missed something19:17:29
@jcie74:matrix.orgpie_hm ok these are a little sparse for me to make a lot of sense of them, im also distracted right now by trying to write a hypothetical workshop outline 'xD , ill forward these19:20:00
@hmenke:matrix.orghmenke danielrf: Unfortunately I gave my bacon away, so I won't be able to test it again until I get it back which could be quite some time. 19:51:06
@hmenke:matrix.orghmenkeI'll close the issue for now.19:51:14
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfNo problem! just following up on some older issues19:51:42
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr danielrf: should I get in touch with that individual working on running mainline android kernel with lineageos on OP6 for details, thinking about the vanilla kernel issue 19:52:04
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfThat could be nice to test our built kernels on a real device, but it's not necessary to get started19:53:21
@danielrf:matrix.orgdanielrfI probably wouldn't worry about it until we're a little further along19:53:28
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrI was thinking that if you had the device tree around to look at you might be able to gauge whether it's relevant or not, and whether you're causing more work for the future :19:54:06

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6