17 Apr 2024 |
hexa | SUBSYSTEM=="cpu", ACTION=="add", TEST=="online", ATTR{online}=="0", ATTR{online}="1"
| 15:11:39 |
adamcstephens | ahh so just a udev rule | 15:27:40 |
adamcstephens | does memory hot add work or do we need something similar? | 15:27:51 |
hexa | that works | 15:32:17 |
hexa | 4GB -> 2GB -> 4GB tested | 15:32:25 |
adamcstephens | cool | 15:32:29 |
adamcstephens | so this is just CPU, and just for VMs? | 15:32:37 |
adamcstephens | i'm done grading now so i can actually just test it myself :) | 15:32:57 |
hexa | yes | 15:33:13 |
hexa | opened an issue | 15:33:18 |
hexa | referenced what suse is doing | 15:33:22 |
adamcstephens | cool, thanks | 15:33:27 |
hexa | took their rule and dropped the x86_64 constraint | 15:33:35 |
adamcstephens | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network took their rule and dropped the x86_64 constraint what is the "upstream" you speak of here? | 16:13:08 |
hexa | possibly incus agent? | 16:13:30 |
hexa | also we should rebrand our stuff | 16:14:34 |
adamcstephens | lxd -> incus ? | 16:14:44 |
hexa | yep | 16:14:47 |
hexa | ubuntu has incus-agent.service, we have lxd-agent.service | 16:14:56 |
adamcstephens | which ubuntu image are you using ? the linuxcontainers image? | 16:15:27 |
hexa | yep | 16:15:34 |
hexa | ubuntu/24.04 | 16:15:39 |
adamcstephens | i've thought about changing the agent and renaming the release artifacts, though we may still want aliases for the release artifacts | 16:15:53 |
hexa | mkRenamedOptionModule? | 16:16:12 |
adamcstephens | i've accepted leaving lxd in as an lts for now, so we need to keep it in mind. | 16:16:30 |
adamcstephens | the linuxcontainers images only need to target incus | 16:16:44 |
hexa | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf i've accepted leaving lxd in as an lts for now, so we need to keep it in mind. until 2027? 🤔 | 16:34:43 |
hexa | that seems excessive | 16:34:49 |
adamcstephens | No, for now :) though I’m still debating marking it deprecated for 24.05 | 17:03:17 |
adamcstephens | Wish we had usage data. | 17:03:50 |