| 5 Mar 2024 |
 hexa | ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
linuxcontainers.org. 3600 IN NS ns1.stgraber.org.
linuxcontainers.org. 3600 IN NS ns2.stgraber.org.
| 13:34:26 |
| hexa | "linuxcontainers" 😄 | 13:34:32 |
 adamcstephens | right. | 13:36:16 |
| adamcstephens | mostly stgraber | 13:36:27 |
| adamcstephens | https://bgp.tools/as/399760 | 13:37:16 |
| adamcstephens | serious about running his own infra | 13:38:14 |
| hexa | looks like a failed KSK rollover for stgraber.org and linuxcontainers.org | 13:38:22 |
| hexa | looks like he noticed it just now | 13:43:16 |
| adamcstephens | after you pinged him, yes :) | 13:46:25 |
| hexa | 😛 | 13:46:52 |
| 9 Mar 2024 |
| adamcstephens | bah, i didn't think enough when refactoring to add lts support to incus and broke overriding 🤦♂️ | 16:13:36 |
| adamcstephens | the three solution i'm seeing are:
- move the unwrapped back to its own package
- eliminate the wrapper and move the wrapping back into the main package
- move the wrapper code into the module
| 16:14:20 |
| adamcstephens | i started doing #3, but do i want to lose the ability to run this outside systemd if that ever comes to fruition? | 16:17:06 |
| adamcstephens | maybe i'm just overthinking potential systemd alternatives | 16:18:28 |
| hexa | yeah, people have annoyed me with "needs to run w/o the nixos module" alot of times | 16:20:33 |
| hexa | in which case they should start start maintaining that part | 16:20:46 |
| adamcstephens | i don't like #2 because coupling a complex wrapper with the package feels wasteful to me | 16:21:43 |
| hexa | case in point: matrix-synapse-unwrapped | 16:22:03 |
| adamcstephens | ok, i'll finish up #3. if a systemd alternative ever comes, i can rethink this again then :) | 16:22:40 |
| adamcstephens | really this only applies to incusd anyway. there's only one extra package for the client, which is spice for gui consoles | 16:24:06 |
| adamcstephens | thanks for your input hexa | 16:24:24 |
| hexa | yw | 16:24:32 |
| adamcstephens | building go packages is so refreshing compares to rust :) | 17:05:46 |
| 10 Mar 2024 |
| adamcstephens | mkg20001 if you update the UI package will you make it a full package instead of overriding the lxd one? | 17:42:01 |
 mkg20001 | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
mkg20001 if you update the UI package will you make it a full package instead of overriding the lxd one? why? is there any issue with the override? | 18:15:56 |
| adamcstephens | Don’t we want to ensure we update any patches/scripts from zabbly when we update the source package? | 18:17:22 |
| adamcstephens | I’m also still hoping to deprecate lxd. I’ve just been waiting for incus LTS | 18:17:51 |
| hexa | after reading alot of the docs; does incus support online migration with anything but ceph? | 18:22:56 |
| hexa | I feel they're not being clear on what is possible with what | 18:23:27 |
| adamcstephens | maybe the new lvmlock support? | 18:39:17 |
