!VhzbGHamdfMiGxpXyg:robins.wtf

NixOS Incus and LXC

51 Members
lxc, lxd, incus discussions related to NixOS19 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
25 Apr 2026
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephenswe already have the image files, we just need a service to construct a simplestreams service21:58:34
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephenshttps://images.linuxcontainers.org/streams/v1/images.json22:03:49
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaMeh22:16:13
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaLet's not22:16:15
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensdoesn't seem that hard. though i wouldn't stop publishing to their server22:24:00
@hexa:lossy.networkhexabut that means either nixos/infra or you in the pipeline22:29:43
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand who would use our feed?22:30:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathe default feed is what matters22:30:12
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephenswhat i was noodling on today was a nixos service which could provide nixos images to nixos users. mostly a thought experiment for now anyway. i'm not diving into another project right now :)22:55:34
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens locally to nixos installs of incus 23:01:46
27 Apr 2026
@ninja:worldethicaldataforum.orgNinja joined the room.14:27:42
29 Apr 2026
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens https://github.com/lxc/lxcfs/releases/tag/v7.0.0 01:00:56
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensit's starting01:01:06
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephenshttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/51481118:20:39
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensguess i can't delay this decision any longer, since minio being insecure is now hitting the channels18:21:16
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensI'd missed that was done, or would have put this in place earlier because the UX is bad without it18:23:05
@tom:dragar.deTomsorry, should've at least forwarded it to this channel. I was under the false assumption it wouldn't be possible to deal with this by gating that feature and we kinda would just have to deal with it for now.18:26:32
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensyeah, luckily these are all just in the module so it's pretty easy to toggle. the tricky thing was making sure we force existing users to decide on a course of action, which this does by setting it to null for stateVersion<26.1118:31:12
30 Apr 2026
@tom:dragar.deTomui, i kinda didn't expect this to still happen https://github.com/lxc/incus/pull/325819:42:59
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensi suspected it may still be coming. as he said, he doesn't want to be tied to it for 5 years19:45:14
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensi wasn't expecting completely DIY, but if it works 🤷‍♂️19:45:59
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensthe bucket model felt awkward when i tried it out, so i stayed on garage.19:46:15
@tom:dragar.deTomyeah, that there is the necessity of doing something is very clear. Just the timeline is certainly ambitious given that this PR was opened on the day 7.0 is supposed to happen19:53:52
@hexa:lossy.networkhexabold choice19:58:07
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensagreed20:17:15
@tom:dragar.deTomi mean, we already do have it gated behind a feature flag now. So we could keep that around for a couple of months ... but then, i also don't know yet how i feel about that idea.20:27:34
@tom:dragar.deTomi suppose there should be release Notes entry for those 7.0 bumps?20:28:30
@tom:dragar.deTom* i suppose there should be release Notes for those 7.0 bumps?20:30:33
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensit'll be harder to feature flag when it's built with the package20:33:24
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensin fact we should probably drop the option again, because it won't work without parameterizing the package build (if even possible)20:34:02

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10