| 15 Mar 2026 |
|  NixOS Moderation Bot banned  @jykrwn_bot:matrix.org (disagreement). | 20:28:00 |
| 20 Mar 2026 |
 hexa | the newest fun time I have is when the ext4 filesystem of a guest gets corrupted during online migration with zfs send, when the host is busy with i/o | 16:41:46 |
| hexa | in our cast mostly gitlab runner | 16:41:52 |
| hexa | e.g. when building nix things | 16:42:08 |
| hexa | three weeks in a row now | 16:42:31 |
| hexa | Redacted or Malformed Event | 16:45:16 |
 adamcstephens | "fun" | 17:08:24 |
| hexa | yup | 17:26:26 |
| hexa | Which makes it pretty clear that I'm going to stay with ceph for other setups, even if writes are more expensive. | 21:04:51 |
| hexa | Now if only the nixpkgs packaging of ceph was better | 21:05:37 |
 Tom | better in which aspect? Haven't looked at it just heard that ceph and nixos aren't necessarily the best combo. | 21:09:58 |
| hexa | they could be | 21:18:27 |
| hexa | arrow-cpp-19.nix
boost-1.85.patch
boost-1.86-PyModule.patch
old-python-packages/
old-python-packages/cryptography-vectors.nix
old-python-packages/cryptography.nix
old-python-packages/python-cryptography-Cherry-pick-fix-for-CVE-2023-49083-on-cryptography-40.patch
old-python-packages/trustme.nix
| 21:18:42 |
| hexa | nix-repl> ceph.version
"19.2.3"
| 21:19:16 |
| hexa | squid will run out of support during the 26.05 release cycle | 21:19:59 |
| hexa | there is no clear maintainer for this package | 21:20:19 |
| Tom | oh, there are even two PRs for it 😅
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/494887 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/494583 | 21:21:49 |
| Tom | the second does look like it improves the overall situation | 21:39:21 |
| Tom | but yeah, there curently doesn't seem to be an (active) committer involved | 21:52:25 |
| 24 Mar 2026 |
| adamcstephens | huh, I didn't realize we'd added an nspawn driver for tests. That could really help the Incus tests since they rely on nested virtualization which is problematic outside x86 | 20:03:10 |
| 28 Mar 2026 |
| adamcstephens | The release announcements really make it sound like there's a distro group that gets notified of security releases, but I have no clue where that is and I'm not being contacted... | 03:18:03 |
| adamcstephens | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/504279 | 03:18:22 |
| hexa | https://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros | 12:43:35 |
| 30 Mar 2026 |
| adamcstephens | Incus LTS 7.0 is planned to be released on 4/30. That's after release breaking change deadline, but since I don't expect it to be an actual breaking change, I'd like to get it in 26.05. If you have any thoughts, please share. | 15:18:18 |
| Tom | it's my understandig too that it's basically just 6.24 which is becoming 7.0, but we'll see | 15:20:22 |
| Tom |
The Incus 6.0 LTS release will be supported until June 2029. The first 2 years of support will include bug and security fixes as well as minor usability improvements. The remaining 3 years of support (following Incus 7.0 LTS’ release) will only feature security updates.
https://linuxcontainers.org/incus/docs/main/support/
| 15:24:30 |
| Tom | given that the last security updates didn't even get a release tag yet it sure would be better to be on 7.0 though | 15:24:39 |
| Tom | one could of course also introduce incus6-lts and incus7-lts. But that seems like quite a headache | 15:25:57 |
| Tom | * one could of course also introduce incus6-lts and incus7-lts. But that seems like quite a headache and hopefully not worth it | 15:26:21 |
| Tom | * one could of course also introduce incus6-lts and incus7-lts. But that seems like quite a headache and hopefully not worth it (because they aren't to breaking anyway) | 15:26:42 |
