!VyoUhyWvlhSpFWWxHL:matrix.org

Zulip setup coordination

94 Members
Coordination to setup https://nixpkgs.zulipchat.com/, see https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/14335 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
3 May 2024
@niko:conduit.rsnyanbinary
In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
Btw raitobezarius, very nice idea to sneakily introduce better tooling to the community, I know your intent is for everybody to realise that Matrix sucks in comparison and will want to switch to Zulip for everything πŸ˜†
Personally I think it good to have Zulip for the governance and Matrix for the community
00:11:09
@niko:conduit.rsnyanbinaryMatrix has some potential. Maybe.00:11:21
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI will let the governance decide the future of Zulip, I think it's only natural to do so!00:11:28
@wonder-tmp:the-apothecary.clubIris [you&] ∈ Wonder& [y&]Gravely Undesired Insomnia00:12:13
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilGlad we were able to confirm our invite limit to be higher than 100 per day, we already have ~90 comments in the last 10 hours! https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/14300:15:23
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil * Glad we were able to confirm our invite limit to be higher than 100 per day, we already have ~90 requests in the last 10 hours! https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/14300:15:34
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆI am not surprised :)00:16:16
@lovesegfault:matrix.orglovesegfaultAre invites being sent out already?00:31:20
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @lovesegfault:matrix.org
Are invites being sent out already?
https://nixpkgs.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/410861-general/topic/Invite.20discussion/near/436788789
00:31:44
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilEuropean morning :)00:32:04
@lovesegfault:matrix.orglovesegfaultACK, amazing work y'all, thanks :) 00:32:50
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilGeneral Uncle Iroh 🍡00:59:57
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil

Did I just disqualify myself πŸ˜†

I don’t want people with strong opinions on technicalities like flakes vs. classic Nix

01:01:53
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI feel like those ideas are interesting01:02:15
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusBut I think saying "X vs. Y" is already setting up the tone and being binary01:02:24
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusFlakes vs. Classic is an excellent example01:02:29
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThis is a spectrum01:02:33
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThere's absolutely ways to make Flakes good while keeping the Classic taste01:02:44
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilπŸ’―01:02:50
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThe RFC about repairing layering violations, etc. is also taking that trajectory AFAIK01:03:02
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilIndeed, that one was just a bit too abstract imo though πŸ˜…01:04:04
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilIt's hard to decide whether it is implement01:04:17
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI see it as one of those RFCs which are most "peace treaties" and "intents" things that anything else01:04:37
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusYeah, they are not perfect, confusing, abstract01:04:44
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusBut they are sending an important signal to the community01:04:50
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusNow, onto the execution, this is a different matter01:04:55
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusAnd to me, interestingly, this is governance material!01:05:09
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusBut we are doing almost governance!01:05:21
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusSo we should maybe leave it at there :)01:05:25
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilHaha yeah01:05:32

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10