| 2 May 2024 |
 infinisil | We should delete comments in https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/143 that were invited already, to avoid leaking the users email addresses forever (it wasn't a great choice to do it this way, but by deleting them we can fix it, and know which ones were already invited!) | 22:21:13 |
| infinisil | Jonas Chevalier: Can you ensure that all the Zulip moderators have write permission to the foundation repo? That's the permission needed to delete comments (obviously we won't abuse this) | 22:22:25 |
 edef | fwiw i think most people used their already-public GitHub email, or a disposable address | 22:24:02 |
 joepie91 🏳️🌈 | infinisil: was the intent not to have a historical record? | 22:24:09 |
| edef | i think people understood they were posting an address publicly | 22:24:35 |
 raitobezarius | worst case, people can censor or remove their address after invite | 22:24:56 |
| edef | it is a minor abuse vector to have them all nicely listed like this, but i think it's fine | 22:25:02 |
 @zimbatm:numtide.com | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
Jonas Chevalier: Can you ensure that all the Zulip moderators have write permission to the foundation repo? That's the permission needed to delete comments (obviously we won't abuse this) you and raito have maintain rights now, let me know if somebody else is taking care of the invites | 22:25:05 |
| edef | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
worst case, people can censor or remove their address after invite edit history shows on github | 22:25:09 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @edef1c:matrix.org
edit history shows on github if people want to avoid bot scraping | 22:25:22 |
| raitobezarius | edit history won't be scraped | 22:25:27 |
| raitobezarius | I meant removing the comment BTW | 22:25:40 |
| raitobezarius | brain went dumb | 22:25:44 |
| raitobezarius | Can someone fill me on the process to invite someone from the issue? | 22:26:20 |
| infinisil | I think people can remove their own comments. We can post a comment ourselves when we're up-to-date with the invites, so that people know that they can delete their comment | 22:26:47 |
| infinisil | Although I guess people don't want to be subscribed to that thread lol | 22:26:59 |
| infinisil | Okay let's not worry about this too much | 22:27:13 |
| infinisil | raitobezarius: Can you make sure that everybody can post in the governance stream? | 22:27:38 |
 @squalus0:matrix.org | It's probably going to end up archived anyway, I don't think it's a big deal | 22:27:41 |
| raitobezarius | 
Download image.png | 22:27:55 |
| raitobezarius | full members are defined members who joined and waited a certain wait period which I think is close to 0 | 22:28:10 |
| infinisil | Ah I was confused because of https://nixpkgs.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/435724-governance/topic/stream.20events/near/436563472 | 22:28:47 |
| infinisil | Alright then let's jump to https://nixpkgs.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/410861-general/topic/Invite.20discussion to briefly discuss how to invite I'd say :) | 22:29:27 |
| infinisil | raitobezarius: I wonder, should we wait until tomorrow morning to start with invites? So that there's a mod there in the start | 22:30:48 |
| raitobezarius | No opinion | 22:31:23 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | given the time that might be better | 22:31:34 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | it's getting late in EU already | 22:31:51 |
 danielle | i'm probs about to go to bed | 22:32:31 |
 @hexa:lossy.network | same | 22:32:51 |
| danielle | by which i mean "go finish up some dayjob stuff i wanted to finish earlier but didn't bc of nix 😅 while watching garbage tv in bed" | 22:32:52 |
