| 2 May 2024 |
 nyanbinary | O | 22:10:08 |
| nyanbinary | What about the suggestions for the coc? | 22:10:18 |
 danielle | nyanbinary: we can open a PR for the last few refinements | 22:10:45 |
| danielle | none of them change meaning or intent | 22:10:45 |
 raitobezarius | I'm logged in, if anyone has issues or concerns about Zulip, please reach out to me. | 22:12:07 |
| raitobezarius | I am caught up with the discussion and I see that folks had the Zulip folks answer them about the invitation limit. | 22:12:27 |
 infinisil | Perfect timing, let's get this Zulip party started! | 22:12:34 |
| raitobezarius | (note that Zulip folks are very easy to reach out to as long as TZ stuff works well) | 22:12:37 |
| danielle | (working on the PR now) | 22:12:46 |
 lovesegfault | itshappening.gif | 22:14:10 |
| infinisil | raitobezarius: I updated https://discourse.nixos.org/t/zulip-for-governance-discussions/44684#moderation-3 with the link to the new zulip CoC, can you do the same for GitHub? | 22:15:10 |
| infinisil | I'll start adding the CoC and deescalation docs to each stream topic | 22:15:38 |
| danielle | https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/pull/145 - Jonas Chevalier / ronef tiny pr with a couple of refinements from suggestions that got missed in 144 | 22:17:08 |
 @zimbatm:numtide.com | updated the foundation statement to point to https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/143 | 22:17:16 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
raitobezarius: I updated https://discourse.nixos.org/t/zulip-for-governance-discussions/44684#moderation-3 with the link to the new zulip CoC, can you do the same for GitHub? done | 22:21:12 |
| infinisil | We should delete comments in https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/143 that were invited already, to avoid leaking the users email addresses forever (it wasn't a great choice to do it this way, but by deleting them we can fix it, and know which ones were already invited!) | 22:21:13 |
| infinisil | Jonas Chevalier: Can you ensure that all the Zulip moderators have write permission to the foundation repo? That's the permission needed to delete comments (obviously we won't abuse this) | 22:22:25 |
 edef | fwiw i think most people used their already-public GitHub email, or a disposable address | 22:24:02 |
 joepie91 🏳️🌈 | infinisil: was the intent not to have a historical record? | 22:24:09 |
| edef | i think people understood they were posting an address publicly | 22:24:35 |
| raitobezarius | worst case, people can censor or remove their address after invite | 22:24:56 |
| edef | it is a minor abuse vector to have them all nicely listed like this, but i think it's fine | 22:25:02 |
| @zimbatm:numtide.com | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
Jonas Chevalier: Can you ensure that all the Zulip moderators have write permission to the foundation repo? That's the permission needed to delete comments (obviously we won't abuse this) you and raito have maintain rights now, let me know if somebody else is taking care of the invites | 22:25:05 |
| edef | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
worst case, people can censor or remove their address after invite edit history shows on github | 22:25:09 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @edef1c:matrix.org
edit history shows on github if people want to avoid bot scraping | 22:25:22 |
| raitobezarius | edit history won't be scraped | 22:25:27 |
| raitobezarius | I meant removing the comment BTW | 22:25:40 |
| raitobezarius | brain went dumb | 22:25:44 |
| raitobezarius | Can someone fill me on the process to invite someone from the issue? | 22:26:20 |
| infinisil | I think people can remove their own comments. We can post a comment ourselves when we're up-to-date with the invites, so that people know that they can delete their comment | 22:26:47 |
