| 2 May 2024 |
 shlevy | Anyway, I’m fine personally with this CoC, though I’d prefer squalus’s suggestion of starting with the Zulip terms and iterating from there if problems arise, I’m just pointing out that there is a cost to a rapid merge here. | 21:47:26 |
 danielle | fwiw i based that doc on a mix of Drupal, Mozilla, and the CNCF, which are all fairly large incredibly diverse organizations with a lot of experience. | 21:48:02 |
| danielle | (like kubernetes projects alone have had 15000 contributors) | 21:48:20 |
 joepie91 🏳️🌈 | In reply to @shlevy:matrix.org
In my view a quick decision without time for serious comments to be made and addressed will be perceived as an illegitimate power play. Depends on how much you’re concerned with the opinions of those who are not convinced about this style of moderation. the thing is that the venue for "serious comments" is meant to be the zulip, not a procedural PR thread - and I feel that it doesn't really matter what we do, it's going to be perceived as a power play either way, based on experiences so far | 21:48:27 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | In reply to @shlevy:matrix.org
In my view a quick decision without time for serious comments to be made and addressed will be perceived as an illegitimate power play. Depends on how much you’re concerned with the opinions of those who are not convinced about this style of moderation. * the thing is that the venue for "serious comments" is meant to be the zulip, not a procedural PR thread (and for good reason) - and I feel that it doesn't really matter what we do, it's going to be perceived as a power play either way, based on experiences so far | 21:48:38 |
 samrose | Is this a one and done thing, will there likely be an ongoing way for the community to feed back and evolve the initial outcome? | 21:49:54 |
