| 2 May 2024 |
 joepie91 🏳️🌈 | big green button at the top right | 20:35:25 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | it lets you create multiple threads and then commit them all at once, that is why | 20:35:41 |
 nyanbinary | oki there :3 | 20:36:00 |
 danielle | nyanbinary: i would strongly reccomend using the suggestion feature rather than just that comment (but to answer, yes, already would be included under other aspects of diversity) | 20:36:13 |
| danielle | * nyanbinary: i would strongly recommend using the suggestion feature rather than just that comment (but to answer, yes, already would be included under other aspects of diversity) | 20:36:18 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | nyanbinary: yep now I see it | 20:36:25 |
| nyanbinary | In reply to @danielle:fairydust.space
nyanbinary: i would strongly recommend using the suggestion feature rather than just that comment (but to answer, yes, already would be included under other aspects of diversity) Its a bit of a foreign concept to a lot of people so I feel like it would be safer to specifically call it out though. | 20:36:56 |
| danielle | (which is why i say to suggest the change so it can be applied 😅) | 20:37:28 |
| nyanbinary | In reply to @danielle:fairydust.space
(which is why i say to suggest the change so it can be applied 😅) Fair but I'm not exactly the best at wording things lol (idk where I would add it) | 20:39:50 |
| danielle | In reply to @niko:conduit.rs
Fair but I'm not exactly the best at wording things lol (idk where I would add it) add a bullet point that says - otherkin to the list? | 20:40:11 |
| nyanbinary | Oki :3 | 20:41:23 |
| danielle | (if you use the review suggestions button that is an easy +1) | 20:43:48 |
| danielle | i'm trying to avoid becoming the person who does all the writing :joy | 20:44:00 |
| danielle | * i'm trying to avoid becoming the person who does all the writing :joy: | 20:44:02 |
 @squalus0:matrix.org | Why is the incumbent moderation team deciding all of these CoC rules instead of the community? | 20:46:12 |
 shlevy | You are free to comment or propose your own | 20:46:42 |
| danielle | (I also was not a moderator when I wrote those rules) | 20:46:57 |
| shlevy | They haven’t been merged yet | 20:47:18 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | community members have also been involved in this process here; and the intent right now is specifically to set up a code of conduct that will result in a constructive governance environment - this new code of conduct is not for the broader community | 20:47:42 |
| @squalus0:matrix.org | I could propose my own, but I'd want to get assent and input from the community members that meet the contribution criteria. | 20:47:53 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | it is a bootstrapping operation to then make governance discussion about community-broad code of conduct possible | 20:48:02 |
 @zimbatm:numtide.com | On point: moderators should stay out of the conversation to avoid being seen as arbiters on opinions | 20:48:33 |
| @zimbatm:numtide.com | * One point: moderators should stay out of the conversation to avoid being seen as arbiters on opinions | 20:48:46 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | (the code of conduct for the community is within scope for what the new governance structure(s) will decide over) | 20:48:57 |
| @zimbatm:numtide.com | This has been an issue in the past | 20:48:57 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | Jonas Chevalier: I do not think this is viable for a governance discussion specifically; moderators have some of the strongest insight in the (historical and current) dynamics within the community, and the policy changes affect them too | 20:49:43 |
| danielle | I've joined the team partially because of extensive governance experience to help keep things productive 😅 | 20:50:12 |
|  @leona:leona.is joined the room. | 20:50:13 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | they are very much a stakeholder | 20:50:17 |
| danielle | if that means i should leave the moderation team mid onboarding to be able to continue to do governance setup that is... amusing but technically doable? | 20:50:42 |
