| 2 May 2024 |
 infinisil | https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/138-user-questions/topic/Increasing.20daily.20invitation.20limit/near/1792372 | 20:11:43 |
 joepie91 đłď¸âđ | I am unhappy about github not auto-updating as new comments arrive | 20:13:14 |
 shlevy | Yeah I missed several | 20:13:27 |
 lovesegfault | In reply to @danielle:fairydust.space
We take responsibility for our impact and our mistakes - if someone says that they have been harmed by our words or actions, we stop, listen, and then apologize sincerely and change behavior.
Who are the arbiters who prevent this from being weaponized? | 20:13:49 |
 danielle | In reply to @lovesegfault:matrix.org
Who are the arbiters who prevent this from being weaponized? the zulip moderators? | 20:14:07 |
| shlevy | lovesegfault: If you think someone is accusing in bad faith, get a mod | 20:14:10 |
| joepie91 đłď¸âđ | shlevy: I've noted this in the subthread on the PR | 20:14:16 |
| joepie91 đłď¸âđ | shlevy: (thumbs up on the comment would be helpful if you agree with the summary, to confirm) | 20:14:59 |
|  @squalus0:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:15:00 |
| danielle | How much time do we want to spend replying to comments from people who aren't part of the nix community? | 20:18:26 |
| shlevy | In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
shlevy: (thumbs up on the comment would be helpful if you agree with the summary, to confirm) Replied | 20:19:42 |
 7c6f434c | You want to say ÂŤnot eligible for Zulip governance read-write accessÂť? (what is a part of Nix community is still in airâŚ) It's true that they kind of don't have true vested interest | 20:20:09 |
| 7c6f434c | * You want to say ÂŤnot eligible for Zulip governance read-write accessÂť? (what is to be a part of Nix community is still in the airâŚ) It's true that they kind of don't have true vested interest | 20:20:35 |
| joepie91 đłď¸âđ | shlevy: thanks | 20:23:14 |
| lovesegfault | In reply to @danielle:fairydust.space
How much time do we want to spend replying to comments from people who aren't part of the nix community? Almost none, IMO | 20:23:50 |
| lovesegfault | The most destructive thing to any discussion is someone with no skin in the game | 20:24:18 |
 @zimbatm:numtide.com | In reply to @shlevy:matrix.org
OK, Iâm willing to sign on to this. Is there a way to phrase that better so you would have understood this in the first read? The difference is quite subtle IMO so it's easy to misunderstand it. | 20:25:03 |
 David SĂĄnchez | Sorry if this has been brought up steady, please feel free to point me for the references if any, but whatâs âthe communityâ here? Contributors to nixpkgs? | 20:25:12 |
| David SĂĄnchez | * Sorry if this has been brought up already, please feel free to point me for the references if any, but whatâs âthe communityâ here? Contributors to nixpkgs? | 20:25:27 |
| shlevy | In reply to @zimbatm:numtide.com
Is there a way to phrase that better so you would have understood this in the first read? The difference is quite subtle IMO so it's easy to misunderstand it. âapologize that harm was causedâ wouldâve been clearer I think. | 20:25:33 |
| shlevy | I donât think this is necessary but it may be worthwhile to say âif you believe an accusation is being made in bad faith, please work with the moderators rather than counter-accusing or dismissing the claimâ | 20:26:17 |
| shlevy | David SĂĄnchez: Thereâs a list of criteria in the Zulip join issue | 20:26:40 |
| shlevy | https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/143 | 20:26:57 |
| danielle | In reply to @shlevy:matrix.org
I donât think this is necessary but it may be worthwhile to say âif you believe an accusation is being made in bad faith, please work with the moderators rather than counter-accusing or dismissing the claimâ Bad faith activity is already included fwiw | 20:27:15 |
| shlevy | Yes, thatâs part of why I donât think itâs necessary. The only reason I think it might be worth saying anyway is that there is an existing impression (justified or not) that some people have been leveraging these kinds of policies to get people moderated, and itâs easy enough to clarify that this policy is all under a presumption of good faith. | 20:28:15 |
| joepie91 đłď¸âđ | nyanbinary: assuming that's you posting on the CoC PR, please leave your comments attached to a line so it becomes a thread | 20:28:42 |
 nyanbinary | oki | 20:29:00 |
| nyanbinary | :3 | 20:29:00 |
| joepie91 đłď¸âđ | (discussion will quickly become unmanageable otherwise) | 20:29:17 |
| danielle | In reply to @niko:conduit.rs
oki fwiw if you leave a suggestion to add things, it should be an easy accept when infinisil is back | 20:29:33 |
