In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
The main point is that decisions shouldn't be made in private

In reply to @piegames:matrix.org
all decisions?

In reply to @jonringer:matrix.org
Ah, this is why I didn't really want to move over the conversation. That there was some discussion in private in this particular case is not really a concern for me, as long as the reasoning behind the decisions is transparent.

In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
From what I understand, jonringer probably wants the moderation team to have a public decision log, which would include why the decision was made

Maybe jonringer, you should consider writing more on those concerns, in details

That actually might be impossible. When trying to reference event concerning certain individual saying "Fuck you" to multiple people, their posts on Discourse were heavily redacted from the original thread. I'm not equipped with reconstituting every event as it occurred originally.

Maybe jonringer, you should consider writing more on those concerns, in details

That actually might be impossible. When trying to reference event concerning certain individual saying "Fuck you" to multiple people, their posts on Discourse were heavily redacted (removed by moderator) from the original thread. I'm not equipped with reconstituting every event as it occurred originally.

Maybe jonringer, you should consider writing more on those concerns, in details

That actually might be impossible. When trying to find references around an event concerning certain individual saying "Fuck you" to multiple people, their posts on Discourse were heavily redacted (removed by moderator) from the original thread. I'm not equipped with reconstituting every event as it occurred originally.

I will happily be in favor of that once some community members stop making a weeks-long blood bath out of every single moderation decision.

We have a reasonable CoC. Moderation actions should be easy to frame in that context.

Making moderation decisions public as an act of transparency should not be seen as an invitation to publicly debate the entire thing

I'd say that depends a lot on whether you can actually understand the decision if you kindly ask for an explanation (in private). Because if you cannot understand it, what expectation is being set? I think as Jonas Chevalier mentioned, the uncertainty is a problem.

I will happily be in favor of that once some community members stop making a weeks-long blood bath out of every single moderation decision.

We have a reasonable CoC. Moderation actions should be easy to frame in that context.

"User was suspended for verbal harassment of another member."