| 4 Nov 2021 |
 Domen KoΕΎar | joepie91 π³οΈβπ fascism is not a defined term | 15:56:27 |
 Jonas Chevalier | This whole Alt-left vs Alt-right is irrelevant to NixOS. Why are we even talking about that | 15:56:51 |
 joepie91 π³οΈβπ | it's actually fairly well-defined, even if adherence to the definition is... not great | 15:56:52 |
| Domen KoΕΎar | How do you define it then? | 15:57:17 |
| joepie91 π³οΈβπ | but feel free to replace it with "oppressive authoritarianism" if you prefer, for the purpose of this conversation they're mostly interchangeable | 15:57:31 |
| joepie91 π³οΈβπ | and that's maybe a bit more of a "says it on the tin" term for it | 15:57:58 |
| Jonas Chevalier | You can be alt-right or alt-left and contribute to nixpkgs. Just don't come talk or try to impose your political views. | 15:58:01 |
 jonringer | I would really like to remove the political labels from the discussion. They have charged meaning, and are likely more disruptive to the conversation than productive | 15:58:24 |
| Jonas Chevalier | We are beings with multiple dimensions | 15:58:27 |
| Jonas Chevalier | We can have a productive conversation, and have different views of the world | 15:58:43 |
 GallantChef | I've legit been losing sleep over this, so I'm going to leave the community for now. I legitimately wish you all well, and I hope from the bottom of my heart that together you come to a solution that works for everyone | 15:59:08 |
| joepie91 π³οΈβπ | In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
So it's allowed to be prejudiced based ona sum of identify but not on a sum of deliberate choices? anyway, I was going to ask: I'm not entirely sure what you mean with this, can you clarify? | 15:59:10 |
| jonringer | RFC 98 is about enacting a moderation team, the discussion should related to the content; without too much extra | 15:59:26 |
| GallantChef | I bear no one any enmity, not even joepie. I apologize if my speech sounded accusative or rude. Thank you for your patience | 15:59:38 |
| GallantChef left the room. | 15:59:49 |
| Domen KoΕΎar | In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
but feel free to replace it with "oppressive authoritarianism" if you prefer, for the purpose of this conversation they're mostly interchangeable Can we then replace it with that term, as I think it's less vague? | 16:04:36 |
| joepie91 π³οΈβπ | jonringer: also, did you understand what I meant with the point about sometimes needing 'policy shortcuts' for effective moderation? as that topic kinda got interrupted :p | 16:04:38 |
| joepie91 π³οΈβπ | In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
Can we then replace it with that term, as I think it's less vague? a term like that or similar sounds like it would be a good idea, yeah | 16:05:04 |
| joepie91 π³οΈβπ | there's probably a more exact term that I can't immediately think of | 16:05:14 |
| joepie91 π³οΈβπ | but I'd personally consider that a reasonable change request | 16:05:37 |
| joepie91 π³οΈβπ | (of course I am neither the author nor a shepherd of the RFC, so it's not really my decision :p but I would expect the responsible people to not have any issues with a clarification like this either) | 16:06:26 |
| Domen KoΕΎar | I would go into details of oppressive authoritarianism, but I don't want to derail the discussion more than I did already :) | 16:10:58 |
