| 4 Nov 2021 |
 joepie91 🏳️🌈 | and that's maybe a bit more of a "says it on the tin" term for it | 15:57:58 |
 @zimbatm:numtide.com | You can be alt-right or alt-left and contribute to nixpkgs. Just don't come talk or try to impose your political views. | 15:58:01 |
 @jonringer:matrix.org | I would really like to remove the political labels from the discussion. They have charged meaning, and are likely more disruptive to the conversation than productive | 15:58:24 |
| @zimbatm:numtide.com | We are beings with multiple dimensions | 15:58:27 |
| @zimbatm:numtide.com | We can have a productive conversation, and have different views of the world | 15:58:43 |
 @gallantchef:matrix.foxears.life | I've legit been losing sleep over this, so I'm going to leave the community for now. I legitimately wish you all well, and I hope from the bottom of my heart that together you come to a solution that works for everyone | 15:59:08 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
So it's allowed to be prejudiced based ona sum of identify but not on a sum of deliberate choices? anyway, I was going to ask: I'm not entirely sure what you mean with this, can you clarify? | 15:59:10 |
| @jonringer:matrix.org | RFC 98 is about enacting a moderation team, the discussion should related to the content; without too much extra | 15:59:26 |
| @gallantchef:matrix.foxears.life | I bear no one any enmity, not even joepie. I apologize if my speech sounded accusative or rude. Thank you for your patience | 15:59:38 |
| @gallantchef:matrix.foxears.life left the room. | 15:59:49 |
 @domenkozar:matrix.org | In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
but feel free to replace it with "oppressive authoritarianism" if you prefer, for the purpose of this conversation they're mostly interchangeable Can we then replace it with that term, as I think it's less vague? | 16:04:36 |
