!YvjJmbmVxFKdRqsLPx:nixos.org

RFC 98 Chat

51 Members
Discussion on RFC 98 [Community Team] https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/9821 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
4 Nov 2021
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townI certainly work towards a 'better good' on a personal level, as an activist. but "NixOS community management" does not play a role in that18:13:46
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer
In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
as I have just said, it's not.
For RFC 98, it is. Language like "social norms" definitely give a "leverage NixOS as a platform to enact an agenda"
18:13:58
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townNixOS community management is about the NixOS community18:14:04
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer
In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
as I have just said, it's not.
* For RFC 98, it is. Language like "social norms" definitely gives a "leverage NixOS as a platform to enact an agenda"
18:14:05
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer * For RFC 98, it is. Language like "social norms" definitely gives a "leverage NixOS as a platform to enact an agenda" connotation 18:14:27
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.town jonringer: social norms are a completely normal part of any kind of community management. I'm honestly not sure why you're seeing more in it than that 18:14:50
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townlike, the "house rules" at your local amateur soccer club serve the exact same purpose18:15:18
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer
In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
jonringer: social norms are a completely normal part of any kind of community management. I'm honestly not sure why you're seeing more in it than that
Yes, and I'm defining the social norms in RFC 114. Not leaving it up to interpretation by an oligarchy.
18:15:27
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townRFC 98 is, again, explicitly non-hierarchical. "oligarchy" is a very strange choice of words18:15:51
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer
noun: oligarchy; plural noun: oligarchies
a small group of people having control of a country, organization, or institution.
18:16:24
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townyes, it is a hierarchical structure18:16:34
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townRFC 98 explicitly seeks to avoid these18:16:39
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townnow if your issue is that it has a hidden hierarchy in it, that'd certainly be a valid concern to raise and try to address18:16:46
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townbut it makes no sense to dismiss a non-hierarchical RFC in its entirety on the basis that "I don't want a hierarchy"18:17:07
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringermoderation team is an instance of oligarchy. Although, may have political connotation depending on reader18:17:55
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townno, it's not. for something to be an oligarchy, the control needs to be absolute18:18:15
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townat least for all practical purposes18:18:24
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townwhich is, again, a thing that only exists in hierarchical organizations18:18:34
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerNo, it doesn't. Just need to project control18:18:39
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.town the role of the moderation team in RFC 98 is to be stewards of the community, not controllers of it 18:18:52
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerWithin the nixos community. communication is paramount. The ability to remove someone's voice in the community is essentially control over them18:19:03
@zimbatm:numtide.com@zimbatm:numtide.comI want to make clear that there are two different goals: "acceptance of LGBT", which I am very much in favor for, and this ^ ideology, which in my mind, is counter-productive to the first goal18:19:16
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerHow do you blaggacao feels about being banned from all official platforms?18:19:17
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.town and some degree of technical 'control' is necessary to carry out that task, but that is very different from power, which is what you are really talking about 18:19:20
@zimbatm:numtide.com@zimbatm:numtide.com^ this is back to an authoritarian view of the world18:20:04
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerPower can be represented any many forms. The ability to deny someone participation is a form of power (e.g. bans)18:20:06
@zimbatm:numtide.com@zimbatm:numtide.comanyways, dinner time!18:20:15
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.town jonringer: sure, it is. power that the community holds in RFC 98, not an oligarchy as you are implying. 18:20:34
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.townI really feel like you're conflating the power and control aspects of this situation18:21:00
@joepie91:pixie.town@joepie91:pixie.town * I really feel like you're conflating the power and control aspects of this proposal18:21:07

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6