| 4 Nov 2021 |
@joepie91:pixie.town | this also puts less pressure on the moderator team as a whole to cast a final decision; if more time is needed, that is possible | 16:23:23 |
@joepie91:pixie.town | (which is important especially if the 'permanent solution' is meant to be mediation/deescalation, which is really difficult to do under time constraints) | 16:24:19 |
@joepie91:pixie.town | of course, implicit in this is that the moderation team does their best to handle this in a timely manner | 16:25:03 |
@jonringer:matrix.org | The timed ban was more or less meant to allow a "grace period" in which not everything is an emergency for the moderation team | 16:27:03 |
@jonringer:matrix.org | people can be aware for periods at a time. And I don't think it's a sustainable model for permanent solutions to always be the one avenue | 16:27:37 |
@jonringer:matrix.org | * people can be away for periods at a time. And I don't think it's a sustainable model for permanent solutions to always be the one avenue | 16:27:42 |
@jonringer:matrix.org | I would also like to get away from instances like blaggacao's ban here it's like, "we made a long term ban, but don't provide any details." | 16:28:45 |
@joepie91:pixie.town | I mean, I call it 'permanent', but it's not really 'permanent', more 'untimed' | 16:29:21 |