| 8 Jun 2025 |
|  @deeok:matrix.org left the room. | 00:03:45 |
| 9 Jun 2025 |
|  SigmaSquadron joined the room. | 13:05:03 |
| 20 Jun 2025 |
|  @genericnerdyusername:matrix.org left the room. | 23:29:34 |
| 3 Nov 2021 |
|  @grahamc:nixos.org set the history visibility to "world_readable". | 18:20:58 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org changed the room name to "" from "". | 18:20:58 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org invited  infinisil. | 18:21:05 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org invited  NixOS Moderation Bot. | 18:21:12 |
| NixOS Moderation Bot joined the room. | 18:21:13 |
| infinisil joined the room. | 18:21:16 |
| @grahamc:nixos.orgchanged room power levels. | 18:21:18 |
| @grahamc:nixos.orgchanged room power levels. | 18:21:22 |
|  Server Stats Discoverer (traveler bot) joined the room. | 18:21:35 |
|  lourkeur (Nix OwO) joined the room. | 18:21:44 |
|  ma27 joined the room. | 18:22:08 |
|  GallantChef joined the room. | 18:22:18 |
|  abathur joined the room. | 18:22:33 |
|  Matrix Traveler (bot) joined the room. | 18:22:57 |
|  jonringer joined the room. | 18:23:22 |
| infinisil set the room topic to "Discussion on RFC 98 [Community Team] https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/98". | 18:24:50 |
|  hexa joined the room. | 18:26:03 |
| jonringer | I guess I'll start it off, I agree with the motivation section, the value section, and some of the transparency in RFC98, however, I think the language of RFC 98 (especially terms like "social norms", "fascism", and "bigotry") Have no place in a foundational "constitution" for a community. It provides a "open for interpretation" to the law, and can be leveraged as, "I don't like their behavior".
I would like to see a CoC similar to rust's CoC which keeps the focus on technology, and makes it clear that malicious behavior is not tolerated. https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/code-of-conduct | 18:27:09 |
| infinisil | To provide a backlink to the previous discussion in #offtopic:nixos.org: https://matrix.to/#/!sgkZKRutwatDMkYBHU:nixos.org/$zpWgO1tKLYI5Hs-t1h_xH_r06IbH4-0riRM8zm9lbNE?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=nixos.dev | 18:27:51 |
| jonringer | Also, not sure when we will open up the RFC back to RFC, as that would probably the most appropriate setting, as this discussion has no official bearing when the committee will meet to review RFCs | 18:29:55 |
|  ryblade joined the room. | 18:30:18 |
| jonringer | * Also, not sure when we will open up RFC#98 as it's in a request-for-comment phase, but no one is able to comment. The RFC would be the most appropriate setting, as this discussion has no official bearing when the committee will meet to review RFCs | 18:31:13 |
| ryblade | so. it's happening in nixos now too... great, just as i started getting interested in it. | 18:32:50 |
|  moritz.hedtke joined the room. | 18:32:55 |
| jonringer | Moving forward, I would like to split RFC#98 into two RFCs, one defining the CoC for the NixOS ecosystem (with no mention of governing body). And another around the governing body, their powers, and the processes by which they exercise their powers (with no mention to CoC) | 18:35:01 |
| jonringer | Tackling those two domains separately, I think we can arrive at a satisfactory end where the intent of 98 can be achieved, without the dogmatic narrative developed. | 18:36:06 |
|  [0x4A6F] joined the room. | 18:38:25 |
