!YvjJmbmVxFKdRqsLPx:nixos.org

RFC 98 Chat

53 Members
Discussion on RFC 98 [Community Team] https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/9826 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
4 Nov 2021
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas ChevalierI feel like we're back to square one17:27:39
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerAgain, if we are forcing people to abide by someone's definition of "social norms", "fascism", and "bigotry". I'm leaving the community17:27:39
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalier joepie91 🏳️‍🌈: is there an agenda that you are not sharing with us 17:28:20
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈 jonringer: there's honestly nothing I can do with that comment, other than be concerned about what you mean with that. I don't feel like you're engaging with my point above 17:28:22
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerThere's a difference between moderation, and enforcing behaviors17:28:22
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈 Jonas Chevalier: "agenda" is a strange choice of words, but I've been pretty explicit about my intentions; I can repeat them explicitly though. I want the NixOS community to be a welcoming, inclusive and productive community, in which there is no tolerance for things like bigotry. 17:29:36
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas ChevalierWe should stop using terms like "ideologies" which are too loaded. Having a set of principles we can follow to work together is not an ideology.17:29:45
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈this is absolutely ideological, and I reject the notion that it isn't, because that only ever ends up being used to present some "rational" and "neutral" option that's actually just popular ideology masquerading as rationality17:30:44
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalier
In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
Jonas Chevalier: "agenda" is a strange choice of words, but I've been pretty explicit about my intentions; I can repeat them explicitly though. I want the NixOS community to be a welcoming, inclusive and productive community, in which there is no tolerance for things like bigotry.
Whenever I see terms like that, I get a very specific sense of "diversity", that is drawn along very specific lines
17:30:52
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈 Jonas Chevalier: it is. that is why I mentioned the paradox of tolerance very early on, for example. 17:31:11
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈eg. I do not believe that people have a right to be a bigot17:31:22
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalierthis is the core of the disagreement I feel17:31:28
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalierit comes down to how we view diversity, and what form it will take17:31:52
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈but to be clear, these specifically drawn lines are chosen to maximize diversity in a 'quantifiable' sense17:32:14
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈hold on, I am not wording this well17:32:36
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalierwhenever you say things like that, it feels exactly what people would denounce of being alt-left17:32:57
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas ChevalierI think this is the last know to untie17:33:26
@zimbatm:numtide.comJonas Chevalier * I think this is the last knot to untie17:33:30
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈

so let's try defining that again:

what I care about as the end goal, is diversity in the sense that the community is a welcoming and productive place for people of as many different backgrounds, experiences, worldviews, and identities as possible.

what I see as an indispensable part of that, and this is where my lines are drawn, is not tolerating ideologies and behaviour which actively aim to oppose (rather than advance) that goal - and that includes bigotry, and a couple of other ideologies that are founded specifically on exclusion of anyone outside of a very specific identity

17:36:30
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈you cannot have a functioning community (at scale) with both diversity and 'anti-diverse' ideology in coexistence, so one needs to go; and my choice for what needs to go is very definitively on the side of 'anti-diverse ideology'17:38:00
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈my 'agenda', if you want to call it that, is that17:38:30
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈(and I hope that it's clear that "anti-diverse" does not include "anti-anti-diverse" as a subset)17:39:17
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerAt least in the US, a "bigot" is already just used as a "someone who doesn't agree with me" term17:39:22
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈that is not the definition that I am using17:39:41
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerI know this is an international community. But "fascism" has also been diluted in a similar fasion17:40:00
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈but I've also not found that definition to be widespread in moderation circles17:40:05
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer * I know this is an international community. But "fascism" has also been diluted in a similar fashion17:40:12
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer
In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
but I've also not found that definition to be widespread in moderation circles
We have other words like discrimination
17:40:34
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringerand it's in RFC 11417:40:47
@joepie91:pixie.townjoepie91 🏳️‍🌈 jonringer: I have had people arguing almost word-for-word at me what you are saying about 'bigotry', but about 'discrimination' :) 17:41:15

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6