| 4 Nov 2021 |
 GallantChef | Fundamentally that's what the reaction against RFC0098 is, a reaction against AuthLeft | 15:47:49 |
| GallantChef | I want to see a moderate, non-partisan solution to moderation | 15:48:05 |
 @joepie91:pixie.town | GallantChef: I am personally strongly opposed to the authoritarian "left" (though I do not really consider them "left" personally) - however, considering that they are not a dominant social or political force, they are pretty much irrelevant from a community management perspective | 15:48:06 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | this does not apply to the alt-right | 15:48:17 |
| GallantChef | That's interesting | 15:48:29 |
 @piegames:matrix.org | In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
one "metric" I often use is "does this person's presence in the community constitute a net positive or a net negative effect on that community?" This. I noticed that many of the more vocal and hostile actors in all those heated discussions aren't actually that involved in the community. However in the other direction that's far more difficult: just because a person is invaluable to the community doesn't allow them to be a total ass. | 15:48:33 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | who, especially in privacy/security circles, come rolling in at a ridiculous rate | 15:48:38 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | also, to be clear, I am not suggesting a blanket ban on alt-right ideology in the NixOS community - I have not yet seen a reason to need to do so | 15:49:06 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | I'm just bringing it up as an example of a past situation where a 'policy shortcut' was necessary to keep moderation workable | 15:49:29 |
| GallantChef | Talking about bans on ideologies is inherently auth. Defending language such as "fascism, bigotry, etc." is inherently AuthLeft | 15:49:50 |
| GallantChef | If that's not your intention, then I can respect that. | 15:50:03 |
| GallantChef | But please, let's try and keep it moderate | 15:50:10 |
 Domen Kožar | You consider someone net negative based on judging their morals, that's how humans work | 15:50:40 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | In reply to @gallantchef:matrix.foxears.life
Talking about bans on ideologies is inherently auth. Defending language such as "fascism, bigotry, etc." is inherently AuthLeft it is very much not, and this is decidedly diverging from the actual conversation topic of this room. I've answered your question regarding the authoritarian left in good faith, but that was not an invitation to start trying to redefine the term and steer the conversation towards party politics | 15:50:51 |
| Domen Kožar | For example in balkans ad hominem attacks are used to express love | 15:50:59 |
| Domen Kožar | Most people here would consider that a net negative | 15:51:15 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | as I have expressed before, I do not want this conversation to be about left vs. right. | 15:51:45 |
