!YvjJmbmVxFKdRqsLPx:nixos.org

RFC 98 Chat

57 Members
Discussion on RFC 98 [Community Team] https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/9825 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
3 Nov 2021
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefFirst establishing a code, and then establishing an enforcing body sounds like a reasonable approach 19:05:59
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefThe body would derive their authority from the former, rather than empowering it 19:06:17
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChef * The body would derive their authority from the former, rather than empowering it themselves19:06:22
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladeand my intent is what should matter, because everyone else's personal interpretation is going to be a different experience, a condition that is impossible to accommodate for everybody.19:06:27
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefSecond to that, you can't make everyone happy19:06:43
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladeit is also to save myself from real physical pain caused by a real physical disability19:06:53
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChef * Further to that (what ryblade said), you can't make everyone happy, and trying is a fool's errand19:07:07
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladeif it's still okay to call it a disability around here19:07:18
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefI think that largely depends on how this RFC ends up19:08:17
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefCompelled speech is definitely a very real possibility 19:08:47
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladei'm new here so go easy on me, i don't know what all the "bad words" are yet19:08:52
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilI don't mind "them" vs "authoritarian", I mind "authoritarian" a bit, imo it dismisses individual users and indicates that there's an "us" and "we", aka a split community19:08:55
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladeoh god19:09:26
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefIsn't that the truth? There are very clearly people pushing for authoritarian policy 19:09:28
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladefirst you want us to stop saying them19:09:31
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladeand then when we are more clear, you're offended by that19:09:36
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefAnd there are very clearly people pushing against that19:09:37
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladeholy moly19:09:39
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefIf two groups are pushing against one another, are they not divided?19:09:51
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladeam i supposed to wear my fingers to dust writing an essay on what specifically i mean by an authoritarian?19:10:37
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefI just want to know what the objective truth is here19:10:43
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefMaybe my perception is flawed 19:10:50
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefBut others seem to agree with my view19:10:56
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil ryblade: You're being very flamey, can you please not? I'm just stating my opinion 19:11:35
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladecould you please then be more clear about what you want from me? i'm feeling rather frustrated atm.19:12:26
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilI want to have a respectful discussion19:12:43
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer ryblade: I would really like this discussion to be for the betterment of the nixos ecosystem. Picking apart diction choice isn't really helping move toward a satisfactory resolution 19:12:55
@ryblade:matrix.orgrybladeas do i19:12:59
@gallantchef:matrix.foxears.lifeGallantChefShall we digress and focus on the implementation of the CoC then? 19:13:18
@jonringer:matrix.orgjonringer
In reply to @gallantchef:matrix.foxears.life
Shall we digress and focus on the implementation of the CoC then?
sure. I'm drafting the RFC now, but I'm going to be basing it upon the rust CoC.
19:13:47

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6