| 19 Apr 2025 |
 emily | do we actually have latest versions of the LTSes? they were vulnerable last I checked | 12:06:18 |
| emily | (and JFX?) | 12:06:28 |
| emily | BTW, Bazel 5 is also already EOL… | 15:03:41 |
| emily | (and there was the Gradle stuff right?) | 15:03:49 |
| 20 Apr 2025 |
 Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Yep. As I understand it, it's very plausible that Gradle 7 goes EOL during the support period for 25.05 | 00:16:28 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Based on what's currently in their issue tracker, I don't think Gradle 9 will be released before 25.05 | 00:17:54 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | (Nearly 200 entries on their release candidate milestone for Gradle 9.0) | 00:18:16 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Oh and there's also Maven 4 which is getting released sometime, possibly this year? | 00:22:48 |
| emily | right. well FWIW Bazel 5 is only used in the TensorFlow source build that we aren't using by default right now anyway (and which the open PRs to bump move past Bazel 5). | 00:24:40 |
| emily | so it should be trivial to knownVulnerabilities | 00:24:51 |
| emily | other than that I would suggest dropping OpenJDK 23 and ensuring OpenJDK/OpenJFX/Zulu/Temurin are on latest versions would be good | 00:25:21 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Just posted on the tracking issue for release blockers, feel free to add a comment if something isn't accurate | 00:29:12 |
| emily | LGTM | 00:30:44 |
| emily | there's really not much using gradle_7; | 00:30:55 |
| emily | Corretto and non-latest OpenJFX I guess | 00:31:07 |
| 23 Apr 2025 |
|  @lorev:matrix.org joined the room. | 21:33:55 |
| @lorev:matrix.org left the room. | 21:38:11 |
| 24 Apr 2025 |
|  ortolanbunting3002 joined the room. | 18:20:29 |
| 25 Apr 2025 |
 Ami | openjdk has been stuck at the same patch for months, why is that? | 15:33:20 |
| emily | I think we bumped it recently. there's not tons of JDK maintainerpower at present | 15:35:49 |
| Ami | i see | 15:37:12 |
| emily | do you mean in stable or unstable? | 15:37:54 |
| Ami | unstable | 15:38:03 |
| Ami | (i somehow manage to repeatedly forget that stable exists) | 15:41:21 |
| emily | I also manage to forget that | 15:45:56 |
| emily | looks like openjdk is on the latest OpenJDK 21? | 15:47:53 |
| emily | 21.0.7 | 15:47:58 |
| Ami | where are you getting this from? | 15:48:43 |
| emily | which part? | 15:49:11 |
| emily | version in Nixpkgs was nix eval nixpkgs/master#legacyPackages.x86_64-linux.openjdk.version but search.nixos.org will also tell you | 15:49:22 |
