| 12 Nov 2024 |
 emily | GC time? | 00:37:05 |
 Tomodachi94 (they/them) | 90% compute, my bad. 90% storage too, but they do a weird thing to calculate your storage usage, "gigabyte-hours" | 00:38:02 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | 90% compute, my bad. 90% storage too, but they do a weird thing to calculate your storage usage, "gigabyte-hours", so a GC wouldn't help very much, maybe a little | 00:38:24 |
| emily | we need to get you more community builder accounts :P | 00:38:24 |
| emily | wouldn't you be better off with, like, the cheapest eBay ThinkPad? | 00:38:42 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Probably :3 | 00:39:42 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Anyways, the patcher is now its own separate hook. I'll refactor the rest of the build story later | 00:55:23 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * Anyways, the patcher is now its own separate hook. I'll refactor the rest of the Maven build story later | 00:56:03 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | (And after discovering that an appendToVar on postPatchHooks doesn't work, corrected to use preConfigurePhase) | 01:22:02 |
| emily | it should be a separate phase I think | 01:23:16 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Yep it is. I tried appendToVar postPatchPhases patchMavenPomHook and then appendToVar postPatchHooks patchMavenPomHook to no avail | 01:25:48 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Yep it is. I tried appendToVar postPatchPhases patchMavenPomHook and then appendToVar postPatchHooks patchMavenPomHook to no avail, only appendToVar preConfigureHooks patchMavenPomHook worked | 01:26:18 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Yep it is. I tried appendToVar postPatchPhases patchMavenPomHook and then appendToVar postPatchHooks patchMavenPomHook to no avail, only appendToVar preConfigurePhases patchMavenPomHook worked | 01:28:08 |
| emily | ah | 01:29:19 |
| 13 Nov 2024 |
|  Inayet joined the room. | 22:15:08 |
| 14 Nov 2024 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/256354 | 18:10:12 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Another day, another new JDK PR | 18:11:37 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * Another day, another new JDK addition | 18:11:47 |
| emily | NO!!!!! | 18:15:46 |
| emily | well actually this is the fancy Azul stuff | 18:15:57 |
| emily | so I guess it might be okay | 18:15:59 |
| emily | replied | 18:21:34 |
| emily | I think it's somewhat of a licensing footgun as it is. I suspect terrorjack may have been (unwittingly?) violating the terms already… | 18:22:00 |
| emily | no inherent objection beyond that though | 18:22:20 |
 terrorjack | feel free to close it; i also suspect it somehow doesn't follow the convention in nixpkgs that require you to manually add the blob to nix store | 18:23:01 |
| emily | yeah I posted that maybe we should requireFile instead | 18:23:35 |
| emily | the no!! was a joke though :) | 18:23:39 |
| emily | just because I've been trying to remove useless JDKs lately | 18:23:47 |
| terrorjack | and not sure that indirection free us from concern of getting a lawyer letter anyway | 18:23:57 |
| emily | I think requireFile is fine in principle | 18:35:34 |
