| 30 Oct 2024 |
 Tomodachi94 (they/them) |
Oracle generally permits use of its marks in groups name that include phrases such as “user group,” “special interest group,” “lobby,” etc., that clarify the relationship between Oracle and the group and do not create confusion about the source of products.
| 17:56:52 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | (IANAL though)
| 17:57:22 |
 emily | ok Debian have a Java team so I'll say it's okay :) | 18:00:11 |
| emily | I hate that Java's idea of a package manager is downloading prebuilt binary blobs | 18:15:20 |
| emily | can we just rewrite every single Gradle build in the tree please? | 18:15:34 |
| emily | it turns out that our current deps.json literally cannot be reproduced | 18:18:06 |
| emily | because JCenter died and they just, killed all the jars I guess | 18:18:14 |
| emily | so even though I fixed it for modern Gradle there is just no way to get the jd-core JAR it wants except using the one we build ourselves and I am not sure I can be bothered to figure out how to tell Gradle to use something local | 18:18:47 |
| emily | bah. never mind I looked it up in a moment of weakness and it's easy. | 18:19:47 |
| emily | oh but we don't even build jd-core for jd-cli! | 18:21:15 |
| emily | and jd-cli's FOD is also not reproducible because it also fetches it from JCenter! | 18:22:27 |
| emily | so we actually should drop that one too | 18:22:40 |
| emily | I kind of suspect we'd find that half the Java applications we build can't even be reproduced now | 18:23:00 |
| emily | fwiw jd-core is not mirrored to any other repositories according to mvnrepository.com | 18:26:19 |
| emily | it's not clear if there are any complete mirrors of JCenter, so that's kind of worrying in terms of reproducibility of our Java packages | 18:26:34 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Tracking issue time! 🙃 | 18:27:06 |
| emily | not on Wayback either: https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://jcenter.bintray.com/org/jd/jd-core/1.1.3/jd-core-1.1.3.pom | 18:27:23 |
