| 25 Sep 2025 |
 msgilligan | Actually (since I last checked) it looks like it's ready. Let me try updating the temurin-bin-25 PR... | 20:20:08 |
| msgilligan | Temurin JDK 25 is here! | 20:58:08 |
| msgilligan | temurin-bin-25 init: at 25 is passing nixpkgs-review on both aarch64-darwin and aarch64-linux and GHA is all green so far. | 20:59:52 |
 emily | hit the button, thank you :) | 21:36:33 |
| msgilligan | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
hit the button, thank you :) Thank you! | 21:39:07 |
| 26 Sep 2025 |
| msgilligan | Sometimes I love timezones: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/446346 | 14:41:57 |
| msgilligan | That was fast! | 14:42:05 |
| msgilligan | It has the usual xxx is a new top-level package using pkgs.callPackage issue from nixpkgs-vet | 14:45:22 |
| msgilligan | and I found 1-2 other issues, but it looks like a great start! | 15:11:14 |
| msgilligan | All issues are resolved and I've given it my ("may not affect merge requirements") approval! | 16:30:23 |
| emily | "rev": "refs/tags/25+29" but "init at 25+36"? | 18:10:01 |
| msgilligan | That's JavaFX | 18:14:28 |
| msgilligan | It confused me too | 18:14:44 |
| emily | ah | 18:25:53 |
| 29 Sep 2025 |
| msgilligan | PR to remove a dependency on jdk23 in gradle: gradle: remove dependency on EOL jdk23, use jdk11 for test
| 23:10:36 |
| 30 Sep 2025 |
| msgilligan | Version 25, of all of the "big five" (or "critical five") JDKs have been merged to master: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/430389 | 15:08:52 |
| msgilligan | And all but openjdk25 have made their way to nixpkgs-unstable and nixos-unstable. | 15:10:01 |
| 6 Oct 2025 |
|  Frédéric Christ changed their display name from Frédéric Christ (🚄 15.09. - 29.09.) to Frédéric Christ. | 09:24:41 |
| 15 Oct 2025 |
 Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Mark Gradle 7 as insecure: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/452022 | 03:13:20 |
| 17 Oct 2025 |
|  Marie joined the room. | 11:02:09 |
| Marie | I started packaging OpenJ9: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/452632 | 11:04:09 |
| emily | do we need even more JDKs? I guess this could replace Semeru? | 11:24:12 |
| emily | I am always beating this drum, but we have so many that nobody is using and that don't get timely security updates... but if it can replace a binary distro that would be nice | 11:24:57 |
| emily | which reminds me I should do something about Zulu 😅 | 11:26:55 |
| Marie | I think OpenJ9 has more value than random jdk build #42, and yes it could replace semeru | 11:47:08 |
| emily | yeah, I could live with Temurin + OpenJDK + OpenJ9 + GraalVM :) | 13:26:40 |
| msgilligan | BTW, I’ve been getting pretty good results with OpenJDK25 (Zulu on Darwin) and GraalVM-CE 25 | 13:34:21 |
| msgilligan | We did find a bug in jpackage (but in a non-Nix build on old Ubuntu) that we are waiting for a fix in 25.0.2. | 13:36:15 |
| msgilligan | I’m happy to finally be on an LTS for FFM (Panama) | 13:37:17 |
| 18 Oct 2025 |
|  @ihar.hrachyshka:matrix.org left the room. | 00:12:31 |
