!aRKdLCkUeIFjRPZuJT:nixos.org

NixOS JVM

121 Members
27 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Jul 2025
@msgilligan:matrix.orgmsgilliganYou don't have to be calling native code to use this feature, you can just use it for memory optimization if you want/need.00:22:04
@msgilligan:matrix.orgmsgilligan Thanks, I added a comment to my home.nix reminding me to migrate from programs.neovim to programs.nixvim! 01:06:35
@infinidoge:inx.moeInfinidoge 🏳️‍⚧️Enjoy o701:07:06
@infinidoge:inx.moeInfinidoge 🏳️‍⚧️It's helped me a lot, as otherwise I would spent far too much time tinkering with Neovim to figure out the LSPs01:07:25
@msgilligan:matrix.orgmsgilliganMy exact worry. I don't have much invested in my current configuration so it will be easy to switch.01:08:18
@samasaur:matrix.orgsamasauri find that the native way to do it is not that hard01:08:50
@samasaur:matrix.orgsamasaurlike it's really wonky but it's mostly just boilerplate that you copy once01:09:03
@samasaur:matrix.orgsamasaurthough i haven't actually tried nixvim01:09:11
@infinidoge:inx.moeInfinidoge 🏳️‍⚧️ * It's helped me a lot, as otherwise I would spend far too much time tinkering with Neovim to figure out the LSPs01:09:17
@samasaur:matrix.orgsamasaurand also i learned last week that the way you set up LSPs has changed in 0.11 out from under me and I still haven't gotten around to swapping over01:09:31
@samasaur:matrix.orgsamasaurhmm maybe i should try nixvim01:09:45
@infinidoge:inx.moeInfinidoge 🏳️‍⚧️My Nixvim-based config for reference: https://github.com/Infinidoge/universe/blob/master/users/modules/global/neovim.nix01:10:06
19 Jul 2025
@vog:matrix.orgvog joined the room.20:04:37
@vog:matrix.orgvog I'd like to run keycloak with PostgreSQL connected via unix sockets. For that purpose, I'd like to add junixsocket to Nix, as I assume this is useful for other Java packages as well: https://github.com/kohlschutter/junixsocket 20:07:13
@vog:matrix.orgvogHowever, I'm a bit confused on how Java packages are meant to be added to Nixpkgs:20:08:51
@vog:matrix.orgvog
  1. Looking at libraries like jogl, but also keycloak plugins, it seems to including binary releases is preferred over building Java libraries from source?
20:08:53
@vog:matrix.orgvog *
  1. Looking at libraries like jogl, but also keycloak plugins, it seems to me that including binary releases is preferred over building Java libraries from source?
20:09:19
@msgilligan:matrix.orgmsgilliganWhy not just use JEP 380: https://openjdk.org/jeps/380 (it's in JDK 16 and later)20:09:22
@msgilligan:matrix.orgmsgilligan* Why not just use JEP 380? https://openjdk.org/jeps/380 (it's in JDK 16 and later)20:09:54
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily building Java libraries from source is hard (because binary .jars are what people push to Maven or whatever) 20:09:54
@vog:matrix.orgvogIs that supported by postgresql_jdbc, and if so, which JDBC URL should I form?20:10:07
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit's not really that useful when a "source build" has all its dependencies precompiled20:10:12
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyfrom-scratch source builds for entire Java dep trees would be cool and there is stuff in Gradle that could make that work, but it's not where the ecosystem is by default20:10:30
@vog:matrix.orgvogOk, no problem for me, actually this simplifies my packaging work. ;-)20:11:21
@msgilligan:matrix.orgmsgilligan I would like to see bootstrappable Java libraries/jars someday, but emily is right, it's not currently practical. 20:11:58
@msgilligan:matrix.orgmsgilliganI don't know, but I took a quick look at the Keycloak website and it is recommending (requiring?) JDK 21, so you shouldn't have to use a 3rd-party (possibly native) library for the raw socket access. I don't know whether the JDBCs drivers are using JEP 380 yet.20:14:11
@msgilligan:matrix.orgmsgilligan* I don't know, but I took a quick look at the Keycloak website and it is recommending (requiring?) JDK 21, so you shouldn't have to use a 3rd-party (possibly native) library for the raw socket access. I don't know whether the JDBC drivers are using JEP 380 yet.20:15:14
@vog:matrix.orgvogWell, the PostgreSQL JDBC driver explicitly recommends using junixsocket: https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/use/#unix-sockets20:15:41
@vog:matrix.orgvog(and doesn't mention JEP 380 at all)20:15:56
@vog:matrix.orgvogThis article explains everything quite in detail: https://www.morling.dev/blog/talking-to-postgres-through-java-16-unix-domain-socket-channels/20:22:16

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6