| 2 Nov 2024 |
 Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * Anyways time to copy/paste the same throw message 8 times for the drop OracleJDK PR | 02:32:51 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | In reply to@emilazy:matrix.org
IMO the justification is: it depends on a package being removed for being an unmaintained security disaster, is many years of out of date compared to what we could be packaging (there are modern Linux versions: https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javacard-downloads.html#sdk-sim), and it has been untouched since 2018 so there is no reason to expect that the former two will be resolved (and it's not your job to do so) Should I call OracleJDK an unmaintained security disaster in the drop message? :) | 02:36:11 |
 emily | 😅 | 02:36:21 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Not sure if I should be more eloquent | 02:36:22 |
| emily | that's your call | 02:36:23 |
| emily | do you mean the throw? | 02:36:30 |
| emily | I gave some more diplomatic wording earlier | 02:36:37 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Yes, and the changelog | 02:36:40 |
| emily | you can go wild in the commit message if you want :P | 02:36:45 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/353043 | 02:43:35 |
