| 3 Nov 2024 |
 Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * It is, through our good friendly dependency chain of ant-> (outdated) rhino -> libreoffice | 22:08:02 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * It is, through our good friend, the dependency chain of ant-> (outdated) rhino -> libreoffice | 22:08:11 |
 emily | yum | 22:11:03 |
| emily | well if you tested a couple things that aren't Rhino I'm happy to yolo it | 22:11:14 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Currently waiting on the builder box to update itself so I can | 22:12:49 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * Currently waiting on the builder box to update itself so I can run nixpkgs-review | 22:12:59 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * Currently waiting on the builder box to update itself so I can run nixpkgs-review on it | 22:13:04 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * Currently waiting on the builder box to update itself so I can run nixpkgs-review on it (and skip LibreOffice, of course) | 22:13:49 |
| emily | I'd suggest running any review in tmux and cherry-picking the Rhino change too | 22:13:52 |
| emily | two birds one stone etc. | 22:13:54 |
| emily | oh oaky | 22:13:56 |
| emily | * oh okay | 22:13:58 |
| emily | then yeah do whatever :) | 22:14:00 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Time to see what other Java stuff is outdated :) | 22:14:28 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | I love that 2/3 of the dominant Java build systems are both Apache projects | 22:15:27 |
| emily | Apache is like the protection racket of Java. | 22:28:31 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Ant is embedded into Gradle?!?! | 22:36:20 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | * Ant is embedded into Gradle?!?! 🫠| 22:36:53 |
| 4 Nov 2024 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Does anyone know where the `jdk16 | 01:06:46 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Does anyone know where the jdk16 attribute went? There is an open issue about it that doesn't apply anymore if it got removed | 01:07:09 |
| emily | EOL | 01:08:21 |
| emily | 8, 11, 17, 21 are LTS; 25 will be too IIRC (current schedule is 2 versions/year, LTS every 2 years, so every 4 versions) | 01:09:33 |
| emily | non-LTS releases are only supported up to the release of the next release, so e.g. 23 will be replaced with 24 | 01:09:45 |
| emily | I think we should actually consider not having stuff like openjdk23 but instead just a rolling openjdk_latest. IIRC Fedora does it like that. | 01:10:09 |
| emily | since pinning a specific non-LTS version it futile, it will be EOL as soon as there is another one | 01:10:23 |
| emily | * since pinning a specific non-LTS version is futile, it will be EOL as soon as there is another one | 01:10:28 |
| emily | so e.g. jdk_8, jdk_11, jdk_17, jdk_21, jdk_latest | 01:10:40 |
| emily | (what's the issue?) | 01:21:15 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | In reply to@emilazy:matrix.org
(what's the issue?) Someone was discontent with the versioning of jdk16. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/138219 | 01:22:40 |
| emily | you know shit is serious when the Java bug reporter has a Duke avatar | 01:23:05 |
