| 2 Nov 2024 |
 emily | do you mean the throw? | 02:36:30 |
| emily | I gave some more diplomatic wording earlier | 02:36:37 |
 Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Yes, and the changelog | 02:36:40 |
| emily | you can go wild in the commit message if you want :P | 02:36:45 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/353043 | 02:43:35 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | (oops, committed a syntax error... somewhere) | 02:44:05 |
| emily | hehe | 02:56:40 |
| emily | I'll ping about Atlassian | 02:57:03 |
| emily | you have a stray change to pkgs/development/compilers/javacard-devkit/default.nix rather than a removal of the file | 02:59:23 |
| emily | looks like we're fine for Atlassian | 03:23:50 |
| emily | needed # Addeds on the aliases btw | 03:24:31 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
hehe Fixed all things and changed the title to be slightly more original (exorcism was already used for "The Great JDK Exorcism"
| 04:42:05 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) |
<@emilazy:matrix.org> hehe
Fixed all things and changed the title to be slightly more original (exorcism was already used for "The Great JDK Exorcism")
| 04:42:18 |
| emily | I think oraclejre is a different version to jre right? | 04:43:57 |
| emily | the replacement in docear may need versioning therefore | 04:44:02 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Looks that way. oraclejre was v8, jre is presumably whatever the latest in Nixpkgs is
| 04:45:42 |
| emily | yeah. should probably pin it to 8 | 04:47:37 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Looks that way. oraclejre was v8, jre is presumably whatever the latest in Nixpkgs is (hopefully not 8)
| 04:47:40 |
| emily | wow, this software is actually at the latest version. | 04:48:22 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | The tempatation to change the last commit message to oracle{jdk,jre}: dehaunt (drop)
| 04:52:47 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Removing 416 lines from Nixpkgs is cathartic | 04:54:01 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Should we continue to have a javaPackages attrset?
| 04:55:24 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | I'm wondering if we should drop Docear haha: https://github.com/BeelGroup/Docear-Desktop
| 06:13:44 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | Officially (according to a comment on the issue tracker that is linked nowhere on the website), they only support OracleJDK, but people have been using OpenJDK without issues
| 06:14:58 |
| emily | In reply to @tomodachi94:matrix.org
Should we continue to have a javaPackages attrset?
it will be compatibility stubs by 25.05 if I have my way | 06:15:16 |
| emily | the only reason OpenJDK isn't already by-name is that I need to teach it Darwin | 06:15:29 |
| emily | In reply to @tomodachi94:matrix.org
I'm wondering if we should drop Docear haha: https://github.com/BeelGroup/Docear-Desktop
what's droppable about this repo? | 06:15:46 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | No commits in 7 years, activity in the issues section has dropped (one issue in 2023, one in 2021, 4 in 2020, and so on)
| 06:16:49 |
| Tomodachi94 (they/them) | If it doesn't actually work with OpenJDK that could be another reason | 06:17:07 |
| emily | https://docear.org/docear/blog/ I like how the two latest updates are identical | 06:17:53 |
