| 19 Jul 2025 |
 vog | Thanks! Regarding my last question, I decided to prefer fetchMavenArtifact, for the simple pragmatic reason that it allows me to easier reference to the sub libraries (junitsocket-common, etc.) separately. | 22:56:48 |
| vog | * Infinidoge 🏳️⚧️: Thanks for your responses! Regarding my last question, I decided to prefer fetchMavenArtifact, for the simple pragmatic reason that it allows me to easier reference to the sub libraries (junitsocket-common, etc.) separately. | 22:57:19 |
 Infinidoge 🏳️⚧️ | Makes sense to me | 22:57:32 |
| 21 Jul 2025 |
|  Pol joined the room. | 15:50:24 |
| 22 Jul 2025 |
| vog | Ok, I finally got around to create the PR. Please review!
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/427538 | 19:18:26 |
| vog | * Infinidoge 🏳️⚧️: Ok, I finally got around to create the PR. Please review!
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/427538
| 19:23:23 |
| 23 Jul 2025 |
|  dish [Fox/It/She] joined the room. | 04:23:15 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pull/422045 heyo folks, looking for reviews from java maintainers and team on this PR on behalf of the person who opened it(who isn't a matrix user). I'm not a java, expert, and the changes look good to me, but would like more experienced eyes to take a look at it. Thanks so much if anyone does review! | 04:25:35 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | * https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pull/422045 heyo folks, looking for reviews from java maintainers and team(mostly just more experienced java folks) on this PR on behalf of the person who opened it(who isn't a matrix user). I'm not a java expert, and the changes look good to me, but would like more experienced eyes to take a look at it. Thanks so much if anyone does review! | 04:27:48 |
 emily | hmm, is that policy we should be deciding ourselves, rather than the user? | 12:48:21 |
| emily | we don't bake fontconfig settings into leaf packages | 12:48:26 |
| emily | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/422043 ah, it does allow overriding like this | 12:49:01 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | i believe the reason for the pr is so that we allow user overriding but have a sensible default | 12:49:16 |
| emily | right | 12:49:34 |
| emily | the issue indicates they are thinking along the right track and have given due considerations to the trade-offs, so it seems sensible to me | 12:50:04 |
