| 6 Jan 2025 |
 K900 | Uhh what | 03:35:18 |
 nzbr (they/it) | i didn't understand what you meant with "systemd activation environment" | 20:35:29 |
| K900 | It's the environment units run in | 21:17:46 |
| K900 | As seen with systemctl --user show-environment | 21:17:58 |
| K900 | Basically right now you can't run graphical stuff from a systemd unit at all | 21:18:11 |
| 7 Jan 2025 |
| nzbr (they/it) | I see. Hadn't tried to do that yet | 00:11:09 |
| K900 | Me neither really | 05:41:20 |
| K900 | At least not voluntarily | 05:41:24 |
| 15 Jan 2025 |
|  SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (utc+3) to SomeoneSerge. | 19:02:57 |
| 17 Jan 2025 |
|  loudgolem joined the room. | 04:05:59 |
| 18 Jan 2025 |
|  mmfallacy joined the room. | 08:08:50 |
| 21 Jan 2025 |
|  Marco joined the room. | 19:17:35 |
| 23 Jan 2025 |
|  shaver joined the room. | 21:45:55 |
| 24 Jan 2025 |
|  jgeofil joined the room. | 06:25:04 |
| 27 Jan 2025 |
| K900 | Did someone touch something | 09:44:18 |
| K900 | My user daemon is not starting | 09:44:30 |
| K900 | * My user systemd is not starting | 09:44:35 |
| nzbr (they/it) | Not to my knowledge
I think it might fail if activation/systemd startup takes longer than some hardcoded timeout (I think it was 10 seconds) because WSL just doesn't start your user session in that case. I had hoped that would be fixed by making the shell wrapper wait for activation to finish, so that WSL init never gets the error code that activation hasn't finished, but it probably doesn't work like that. (The waiting also prevents the shell failing when it is started after the timeout has triggered, so it did something, just not as much as I had hoped) | 11:20:09 |
| K900 | OK it's something about PAM I think | 12:10:07 |
| K900 | Because loginctl no longer detects the session | 12:10:17 |
| K900 | Oh great | 12:10:50 |
| K900 | The login process that WSL usually runs just isn't there | 12:11:44 |
| 28 Jan 2025 |
 common16 | Hey, does anyone have advice on how to install neovim 0.10? It looks like I'm still running 0.9.5 with my flake.nix and it's causing issues with my plugins (like mason.nvim) | 15:41:32 |
| K900 | What channel are you on? | 15:43:31 |
| K900 | Both 24.11 and unstable have 0.10.something | 15:43:36 |
| common16 | This is my flake.nix: http://pastie.org/p/61D4vTo7xA6zNisqpazhtQ
How can I tell what's the latest version of nixos-wsl to use? I'm still on 24.05 | 15:46:04 |
| K900 | Change github:nixos/nixpkgs/nixos-24.05 to github:nixos/nixpkgs/nixos-24.11 | 15:48:31 |
| common16 | Well that was easy lol | 15:53:04 |
| common16 | Thanks K900! | 15:53:08 |
| 31 Jan 2025 |
| SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge to SomeoneSerge (Bruxelles). | 19:34:02 |
