| 8 Feb 2025 |
 K900 | It's not going to run the way you think | 17:25:32 |
| K900 | Nested virt is not good, especially on WSL | 17:25:42 |
 mwoodpatrickmx | Can you elaborate as to why I have none graphical qemu guests running without issue. | 17:28:18 |
| K900 | In reply to @mwoodpatrickmx:matrix.org
Can you elaborate as to why I have none graphical qemu guests running without issue. Because you're trying to do nested virtualization, that's inherently problematic | 17:35:26 |
| K900 | But also NixOS on WSL doesn't have graphics acceleration working properly half the time | 17:35:39 |
|  Marcel joined the room. | 20:26:11 |
| 9 Feb 2025 |
| mwoodpatrickmx | Where can I find the bugs filed against graphics acceleration issues on WSL? | 12:44:25 |
| mwoodpatrickmx | In my NixOS WSL distro the /etc/groups file shows
kvm:x:302
But
ls -l /dev/kvm
crw-rw---- 1 root 104 10, 232 Feb 9 04:14 /dev/kvm
How can I fix this?
| 12:48:08 |
| mwoodpatrickmx | * In my NixOS WSL distro the /etc/groups file shows
kvm:x:302
But
ls -l /dev/kvm
crw-rw---- 1 root 104 10, 232 Feb 9 04:14 /dev/kvm
Other distros (e.g. Debian) show the correct group id. How can I fix this in NixOs?
| 12:49:58 |
| K900 | In reply to@mwoodpatrickmx:matrix.org
Where can I find the bugs filed against graphics acceleration issues on WSL? Do you mean upstream issues or NixOS specific issues? | 12:51:24 |
| K900 | In reply to@mwoodpatrickmx:matrix.org
In my NixOS WSL distro the /etc/groups file shows
kvm:x:302
But
ls -l /dev/kvm
crw-rw---- 1 root 104 10, 232 Feb 9 04:14 /dev/kvm
Other distros (e.g. Debian) show the correct group id. How can I fix this in NixOs?
It doesn't do that for me | 12:52:01 |
| mwoodpatrickmx | NixOS specific issues I'm not seeing the same graphics issues on other Distributions | 12:53:36 |
| K900 | I don't know if there's a specific issue | 12:54:05 |
| K900 | But fundamentally it's just that Windows provides the Linux side d3d12 drivers | 12:54:28 |
| K900 | And those are dynamically linked | 12:54:39 |
| K900 | And don't work as-is on NixOS | 12:54:44 |
| K900 | Actually I think recent Nvidia should work now? | 12:55:03 |
| K900 | AMD definitely not | 12:55:15 |
| K900 | Intel I don't have | 12:55:23 |
| mwoodpatrickmx | I have Intel currently, hoping to get an NVidia digits system when released. Are there other NVidia systems where you think it might work? | 13:00:24 |
| K900 | I don't think those Nvidia systems can even run Windows/ | 13:01:59 |
| K900 | * I don't think those Nvidia systems can even run Windows? | 13:02:00 |
| K900 | They're aarch64 | 13:02:15 |
| K900 | Also they're likely not going to run NixOS out of the box | 13:02:22 |
| K900 | Because they're completely bespoke and don't have drivers in mainline | 13:02:33 |
| mwoodpatrickmx | I would be running some flavor of Linux on the digits system, I would like to be able to use NixOS but need to investigate this further with my colleagues | 13:04:31 |
| K900 | Then you'll have an entirely different set of issues | 13:07:24 |
| mwoodpatrickmx | mwoodpatrickmx: That's what makes life interesting | 13:08:16 |
|  dgb joined the room. | 21:40:12 |
| 10 Feb 2025 |
|  parrvx joined the room. | 18:20:36 |
