| 1 Aug 2021 |
 sterni | John Ericson: seems to me that exherbo doesn't have GNAT at all, at least their gcc seems to statically disable ada and I also did not find any libada package | 17:08:32 |
| sterni | checked arbor's sys-libs and sys-devel/gcc | 17:08:59 |
| sterni | not sure if there is another place I should've looked | 17:09:19 |
 John Ericson | sterni (he/him): we'll just have to do based off other libs | 17:10:58 |
| sterni | yeah libgfortran and libgcc are good candidates I'm guessing | 17:11:31 |
| John Ericson | sterni (he/him): i was just talking to to friend and coworker who was hitting libssp issues with mingw | 17:11:51 |
| John Ericson | i was going to make an issue for repackaging gcc | 17:12:11 |
| sterni | is that the GMP cross issue? | 17:12:16 |
| John Ericson | link? I didn't make mine yet | 17:13:06 |
| sterni | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/132188 (which is linked from https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/132199) | 17:14:07 |
| sterni | so not issue technically :) | 17:14:16 |
| John Ericson | sterni (he/him): ah, yes him | 17:15:50 |
| sterni | ah, I see | 17:16:33 |
| John Ericson | sterni (he/him): https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/132340 | 17:25:17 |
|  alexfmpe joined the room. | 17:33:07 |
| John Ericson | sterni (he/him): alexfmpe how best to make a PR we can all push to? | 17:34:56 |
| sterni | John Ericson: I think you and me should be able to push to any branch in alex's fork for which a PR exists if the allow maintainers to push box is ticked upon creation | 17:35:59 |
| John Ericson | ok | 17:36:24 |
| alexfmpe | I don't recall ticking but I see Allow edits and access to secrets by maintainers seems checked on the open PRs, so it should just work? | 17:36:57 |
| sterni | yeah, it's the default | 17:37:19 |
| John Ericson | alexfmpe: can you make a blank PR or something then? | 17:37:38 |
| John Ericson | I can push a few basic things to it | 17:37:50 |
| alexfmpe | In reply to @Ericson2314:matrix.org
alexfmpe: can you make a blank PR or something then? if you mean because of the allow maintainers thing, it shouldn't be needed? | 17:38:31 |
| alexfmpe | or just collapse everything there instead? | 17:38:41 |
| John Ericson | i mean make a branch and make it a PR so i can push to it | 17:39:02 |
| John Ericson | if it's not a PR there is no chance for check box to do things | 17:39:13 |
 siraben | John Ericson: is there a way to make pdp11-aout a valid double? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/131332 | 17:40:25 |
| alexfmpe | huuh I'd expect you to be able to push to those PRs. if you want a new one, I'm not understanding what I should put on it | 17:40:27 |
| alexfmpe | like, it needs actual commits to PR no? | 17:40:39 |
| siraben | https://github.com/JamesHagerman/gcc-pdp11-aout | 17:41:01 |
