| 26 Jan 2026 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | but its one of those things that is just better than the default | 15:52:23 |
 matthewcroughan @fosdem | yeah, for sure | 15:53:07 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | In nixos-musl, if I add those, iproute still ends up in the graph | 15:56:22 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | 
Download image.png | 15:56:26 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | remember this is for pkgs.nixos {} all defaults, maybe you've got some more config that somehow gets rid of iproute from the systemPackages too | 15:57:08 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | modifying environment.defaultPackages for example ? | 15:57:29 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | Yes, it's in environment.corePackages | 16:00:03 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/modules/tasks/network-interfaces.nix#L1771-L1777 | 16:00:33 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | Yeah, I'm not sure how you're able to get rid of that | 16:03:16 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | oh yeah i build systemd without tpm :P | 16:05:28 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | Ah! | 16:05:32 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | How does that actually relate to iproute2 being included in the network tho | 16:05:44 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | * How does that actually relate to iproute2 being included in the network interfaces file tho | 16:05:50 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | like how does tasks/network-interfaces.nix somehow become conditional on tpm | 16:06:05 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | * like how does tasks/network-interfaces.nix somehow become conditional on tpm? | 16:06:07 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | no clue, i just know i haven't heard of any issues with iproute and dropping iptables is the only overlay i have against it | 16:06:23 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | iproute stays in the closure | 16:06:33 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | Then something else must be being done, I don't think tpm is related here | 16:06:37 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | but iptables goes away | 16:06:38 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | Oh okay and iproute is the thing causing the failure | 16:06:50 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | yeah | 16:06:57 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | for me, it doesn't resolve it, iproute2 with iptables is still in the closure | 16:07:18 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | verbatim doing what you said | 16:07:21 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) | the only thing i do to it is remove iptables, other than that the nixpkgs package for iproute just works on musl last i checked | 16:07:29 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | Yeah no, I think this fix you've provided is for a different failure case | 16:09:32 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | iproute2 is failing due to
iproute2> utils_math.c:136:13: error: use of undeclared identifier 'UINT_MAX'
iproute2> 136 | if (sz64 > UINT_MAX)
| 16:10:01 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | Grimmauld (any/all): You won't believe this | 16:26:46 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | an agent did a bunch of web searches and found a fix | 16:26:54 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | https://hina.lysator.liu.se/pub/gentoo-portage/sys-apps/iproute2/files/iproute2-6.18.0-musl.patch | 16:27:17 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | Guess they're already fixing this in gentoo | 16:27:27 |
