| 18 Oct 2025 |
 matthewcroughan @fosdem | ah yes, so it's like, musl doesn't have it | 14:06:25 |
 dramforever | implementing unix_close_range in terms of unix_close_range would be funny ... no it wouldn't work | 14:06:25 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | so it tries to use SYS_close_range | 14:06:29 |
| dramforever | what musl version are you on again | 14:09:08 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | 1.25, everything I'm doing is based on staging-next always | 14:09:48 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | if I'm ever behind it's by a day or two | 14:09:55 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | * 1.2.5, everything I'm doing is based on staging-next always | 14:10:11 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | this is gnu-musl-llvm and musl-llvm though, I went back to musl native for testing, and I get a different error there in nix-expr | 14:10:55 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | the error about close_range is from llvm/musl, so I guess it's about tha | 14:11:09 |
| matthewcroughan @fosdem | * the error about close_range is from llvm/musl, so I guess it's about that | 14:11:11 |
