| 14 Jul 2025 |
 Artturin | In what way? | 21:07:32 |
| Artturin | In the way that it doesn't override the libc selection in systems/default.nix? | 21:07:47 |
| Artturin | Or just a build issue | 21:07:53 |
 lzcunt | I'm trying to get a blame 1 minute | 21:13:12 |
| lzcunt | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/0455292066a49d3670dd7709ee82deb5531aa3c4/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix#L8188 this wasn't updated in 5c1955ff1404eddf3c0379a0573aabe83ac5bca3 (libcCross: Remove!) | 21:21:31 |
| lzcunt | but even if it was, setting anything other than null would throw | 21:21:51 |
| lzcunt | and gcc can't target something with libc = null; because it uses the libc name in the include dir path | 21:24:20 |
| lzcunt | basically in several places nixpkgs pretty much requires newlib for freestanding targets | 21:25:17 |
| lzcunt | * basically in several places nixpkgs pretty much requires newlib (or another libc) for freestanding targets | 21:25:24 |
| lzcunt | i guess i should make gcc deal with libc = null; | 21:26:44 |
| lzcunt | cuz that's the best way to encode "no libc not even newlib" | 21:26:57 |
 Tristan Ross | That's the preferred way | 21:28:31 |
| Tristan Ross | Null means not specificed or unsupported | 21:28:48 |
| lzcunt | expect a fix tomorrow then | 21:29:25 |
| lzcunt | for this too | 21:29:34 |
| 15 Jul 2025 |
| lzcunt | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/425376 is ready and fixes my issues | 11:29:03 |
| 16 Jul 2025 |
 QuadRadical (Ping) | btw @Alyssa Ross, are you planning on rebasing https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/196333? | 01:46:04 |
 Alyssa Ross | It's in progress but testing it takes quite a lot of builds. | 06:36:34 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | right, but cant you rebase it and then multiple people can test? | 13:34:01 |
| 18 Jul 2025 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | Any idea what I should try to fix it? | 19:13:45 |
