| 13 Jul 2025 |
 emily | is this with strictDeps? | 21:48:19 |
 QuadRadical (Ping) | ah yes ill try without | 21:48:45 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | still fails | 21:49:02 |
| emily | ok | 21:49:54 |
| emily | well, can iterate more on the PR anyway :) | 21:49:57 |
| emily | feel free to put it up | 21:50:01 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | oke! | 21:51:05 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | just waiting for nixpkgs-review to complete | 21:55:12 |
| emily | uh that will probably take a while :) | 21:57:23 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | yeah its probably worth doing though, no? | 21:58:03 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | i dont want to break something | 21:58:09 |
| emily | no, it's hopeless to nixpkgs-review changes that go to staging | 21:58:19 |
| emily | (usually) | 21:58:25 |
| emily | especially when it'll definitely need revising for merge anyway | 21:58:27 |
| emily | I assume the reverse dependency closure is in the thousands here at least | 21:58:41 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | oh? | 21:58:59 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | i see | 21:59:04 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | i always tend to nixpkgs-review my prs | 21:59:11 |
