| 20 Mar 2025 |
 lzcunt | upstream supports mono but I tried it and I couldn't get that to work either | 08:48:47 |
| lzcunt | I think I'm gonna give up packaging OpenBVE for nixpkgs, I think they have a flatpak or something | 08:49:11 |
| 23 Mar 2025 |
 Whovian9369 | Hey gang, me again to cause more chaos. Do any of you have experience building a project that uses Nuke.Common for building part of the program? Something I use a lot, https://github.com/Thealexbarney/LibHac , uses it for some CodeGen that needs to be done for proper use of the program hactoolnet.
I do have a derivation that pulls the official binary and patches that if I need to use it instead, but it would be nice to make sure that I have a properly working build that I can do if I need to. | 15:00:35 |
| Whovian9369 | I do also have an existing derivation that skips using Nuke, but it seems to be quietly "broken" in a few ways since the programs expecting you to have done codegen initially. | 15:02:29 |
| Whovian9369 | (You can see that at https://github.com/Whovian9369/whovian_nixos_config/blob/main/home/packages/hactoolnet/package.nix ) | 15:02:49 |
| Whovian9369 | Oh I just noticed that Avalonia seems to deal with this already - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/by-name/av/avalonia/package.nix#L151-L159
Is this the suggested way to deal with that, then? | 15:07:59 |
| 24 Mar 2025 |
 Corngood | Whovian9369: Avalonia doesn't use buildDotnetModule. It just uses the dotnet-sdk hooks and addNuGetDeps directly. You could certainly try to do something similar. | 12:39:33 |
| Whovian9369 | That sounds like my next best attempt. Thanks! | 14:04:14 |
| Corngood | Avalonia was a bit of a proof of concept for avoiding buildDotnetModule. addNuGetDeps is not well documented yet, so let me know if you have any trouble.
overrideFetchAttrs is there to allow fetch-deps to handle multiple target platforms (e.g. linux/darwin-x86/arm).
configurePhase should ideally do everything needed to get the nuget dependencies
buildPhase can call build.sh
linkNugetPackages and makeEmptyNupkgInPackages are hacks for things that don't handle NUGET_FALLBACK_PACKAGES properly or make other bad assumptions
| 14:13:04 |
| Corngood | * Avalonia was a bit of a proof of concept for avoiding buildDotnetModule. addNuGetDeps is not well documented yet, so let me know if you have any trouble.
overrideFetchAttrs is there to allow fetch-deps to handle multiple target platforms (e.g. linux/darwin-x86/arm).
configurePhase should ideally do everything needed to get the nuget dependencies
buildPhase can call build.sh
linkNugetPackages and makeEmptyNupkgInPackages are hacks for things that don't handle NUGET_FALLBACK_PACKAGES properly or make other bad assumptions (use them only if necessary)
| 14:13:38 |
| 1 Apr 2025 |
|  Sandro 🐧 changed their display name from Sandro 🐧 to Sandro 🐧 [c3d2]. | 13:56:06 |
| Sandro 🐧 changed their display name from Sandro 🐧 [c3d2] to "Sandro [c3d2]". | 13:56:50 |
| Sandro 🐧 changed their display name from "Sandro [c3d2]" to Sandro 🐧 [c3d2]. | 13:57:23 |
| Sandro 🐧 changed their display name from Sandro 🐧 [c3d2] to Sandro 🐧. | 13:58:37 |
| 3 Apr 2025 |
|  c00l_game_dev joined the room. | 19:48:31 |
| 7 Apr 2025 |
|  Emmanuel Genga set a profile picture. | 18:11:00 |
| 10 Apr 2025 |
|  anselmetombarel joined the room. | 14:47:27 |
 @magikarpz:matrix.org | can somebody with commit permissions take a look at this PR? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/257489
I'd really want to get going on removing the deprecated buildDotnetPackage stuff, and this PR was blocking it for quite some time
| 20:54:02 |
