!bxVOQwsVoHhZcmNDGw:nixos.org

Nix + dotnet

114 Members
23 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
29 Aug 2025
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodOh it was just the first one that caused a build failure in another package because it was empty 01:00:55
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369Ah fair enough01:01:09
@luna-null:matrix.org@luna-null:matrix.org left the room.02:40:25
4 Sep 2025
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369 I think that I got Kuriimu2 working, and it was overall surprisingly painless once I figured out PackageReference versus ProjectReference. A friend's warning me against doing it this way though, so I have something theoretically "working" at least, but the next step is seeing if I can make the build any cleaner in the process. 00:25:13
8 Sep 2025
@inayet:matrix.orgInayet set a profile picture.02:16:17
9 Sep 2025
@philipdb:matrix.orgPhiliPdB joined the room.18:43:00
10 Sep 2025
@jolman:matrix.org@jolman:matrix.org joined the room.00:25:13
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuelAny plans on upgrading to .NET 10 RC1?11:10:07
@corngood:corngood.comCorngood
In reply to @samuel:mnzn.dev
Any plans on upgrading to .NET 10 RC1?
Assuming that's the one that came out this week, I've got updates running now
15:05:17
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/441849 (still not tested much)18:27:39
11 Sep 2025
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuel Awesome, thanks 06:29:57
13 Sep 2025
@zenware:matrix.orgzenware joined the room.14:58:23
23 Sep 2025
@a-kenji:matrix.orgkenji changed their display name from a-kenji to kenji.10:40:16
@jolman:matrix.org@jolman:matrix.org left the room.20:12:34
24 Sep 2025
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369

Here to cause trouble again - I'm trying to bump a project from NET 8 to NET 9 in a derivation (without code changes, dev says it should work), but that Nuke build process seems to fail due to using a dynamically linked executable... Hapen to have any immediate ideas?

Could not start dynamically linked executable: /tmp/fetch-deps-hactoolnet-2024.08.29.Pzmhk6/source/build/bin/Debug/_build
(Then the message is about stub-ld etc)

02:39:09
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369 *

Here to cause trouble again - I'm trying to bump a project from NET 8 to NET 9 in a derivation (without code changes, dev says it should work), but that Nuke build process seems to fail due to using a dynamically linked executable... Hapen to have any immediate ideas?

Could not start dynamically linked executable: /tmp/fetch-deps-hactoolnet-2024.08.29.Pzmhk6/source/build/bin/Debug/_build

(Then the message is about stub-ld etc)

02:39:19
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369 Alternatively, is there a way to keep the in-progress /tmp/fetch-deps-... path even after a failed run? I feel like that would be good for testing. 02:39:55
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369 *

Alternatively, is there a way to keep the in-progress /tmp/fetch-deps-... path even after a failed run? I feel like that would be good for testing.


The same process works fine on Net 8 but not Net 9, so I'm stumped from what I can tell.

preConfigure = ''
  dotnet --version > DotnetCliVersion.txt
  patchShebangs --build build.sh
  for rid in $dotnetRuntimeIds; do dotnet restore --runtime "$rid" "build/_build.csproj"; done
  ./build.sh Codegen --configuration ${buildType}
'';
02:42:47
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369 *

Alternatively, is there a way to keep the in-progress /tmp/fetch-deps-... path even after a failed run? I feel like that would be good for testing.


The same process works fine on Net 8 but not Net 9, so I'm stumped from what I can tell.

{
preConfigure = ''
  dotnet --version > DotnetCliVersion.txt
  patchShebangs --build build.sh
  for rid in $dotnetRuntimeIds; do dotnet restore --runtime "$rid" "build/_build.csproj"; done
  ./build.sh Codegen --configuration ${buildType}
'';
}
02:43:03
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369 *

Alternatively, is there a way to keep the in-progress /tmp/fetch-deps-... path even after a failed run? I feel like that would be good for testing.


The same process works fine on Net 8 but not Net 9, so I'm stumped from what I can tell.

{
  preConfigure = ''
    dotnet --version > DotnetCliVersion.txt
    patchShebangs --build build.sh
    for rid in $dotnetRuntimeIds; do dotnet restore --runtime "$rid" "build/_build.csproj"; done
    ./build.sh Codegen --configuration ${buildType}
  '';
}
02:43:22
@corngood:corngood.comCorngood
In reply to @whovian9369:matrix.org

Alternatively, is there a way to keep the in-progress /tmp/fetch-deps-... path even after a failed run? I feel like that would be good for testing.


The same process works fine on Net 8 but not Net 9, so I'm stumped from what I can tell.

{
  preConfigure = ''
    dotnet --version > DotnetCliVersion.txt
    patchShebangs --build build.sh
    for rid in $dotnetRuntimeIds; do dotnet restore --runtime "$rid" "build/_build.csproj"; done
    ./build.sh Codegen --configuration ${buildType}
  '';
}
There should be a fetch-drv attribute which you can run nix develop on to do the fetch in a dev shell.
02:50:08
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369Oh thank you, I wasn't aware of that!02:59:19
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodNot sure about the executable thing. It must be pulling that in from somewhere?03:03:23
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369If you mean the dynamic linked executable, then that's part of the Nuke build.03:07:21
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369 I'm expecting the failing step to be the ./build.sh Codegen --configuration ${buildType} one from preConfigure that I posted above 03:08:46
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369

It works on Net 8 as expected, but trying the otherwise same derivation with the Net 9 SDK threw that error, for whatever reason. I'll probably have to try it with Net 8 (via fetch-drv?) and see how much the ldd output differs for these _build binaries.

Here's the Net 9 ldd on _build for example:

$  ldd _build
        linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffffa5f8000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007aef94629000)
        libdl.so.2 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007aef94624000)
        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
        libm.so.6 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007aef9453c000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /nix/store/f6famnry0piih1d3hh6y73fxx05jxsa8-xgcc-14.3.0-libgcc/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007aef9450e000)
        libc.so.6 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007aef94200000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007aef94645000)

Did MS or an Nixpkgs remove linking against libstdc between Net 8 and Net 9? That's the only issue that I can immediately find, for example...

03:11:48
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369 *

It works on Net 8 as expected, but trying the otherwise same derivation with the Net 9 SDK threw that error, for whatever reason. I'll probably have to try it with Net 8 (via fetch-drv?) and see how much the ldd output differs for these _build binaries.

Here's the Net 9 ldd on _build for example:

$  ldd _build
        linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffffa5f8000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007aef94629000)
        libdl.so.2 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007aef94624000)
        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
        libm.so.6 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007aef9453c000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /nix/store/f6famnry0piih1d3hh6y73fxx05jxsa8-xgcc-14.3.0-libgcc/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007aef9450e000)
        libc.so.6 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007aef94200000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /nix/store/8p33is69mjdw3bi1wmi8v2zpsxir8nwd-glibc-2.40-66/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007aef94645000)

Did MS or an Nixpkgs remove linking for libstdc++.so.6 between Net 8 and Net 9? That's the only issue that I can immediately find, for example...

03:13:57
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodNothing comes to mind. This executable must come from a nuget package? But how is it finding any of those libs?03:18:32
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369

This executable must come from a nuget package?

I believe the binary comes from for rid in $dotnetRuntimeIds; do dotnet restore --runtime "$rid" "build/_build.csproj"; done

But how is it finding any of those libs?
Honestly, that's a good question that I don't have an answer to.

03:19:48
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369 *

This executable must come from a nuget package?

I believe the binary comes from for rid in $dotnetRuntimeIds; do dotnet restore --runtime "$rid" "build/_build.csproj"; done

But how is it finding any of those libs?

Honestly, that's a good question that I don't have an answer to.

03:19:52

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9