!bxVOQwsVoHhZcmNDGw:nixos.org

Nix + dotnet

121 Members
23 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Nov 2025
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodIt might be worth making an issue and pinging the maintainers. I don't personally use VS. Are there any more logs available? The one message you sent isn't clear about whether the debug server is missing or failing to start.14:05:00
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuel.NET 10 is out 🎉18:30:58
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369Not immediately available, but I'll see what I can figure out regarding logs. Thanks for the thoughts! 19:31:58
@whovian9369:matrix.orgWhovian9369Oh, it looks like I may be encountering https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/44967920:23:35
12 Nov 2025
@emma:rory.gayEmma [it/its]i dont use VSC either12:29:17
@emma:rory.gayEmma [it/its] rider is mostly okay 12:29:36
@inayet:matrix.orgInayet changed their display name from inayet to Inayet.12:38:45
13 Nov 2025
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuelsomeone's opened a pr for the new releases: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/46112010:15:04
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodI've been working on one too. I should have mentioned it. I'll post it today and compare them.11:32:33
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodI generally start on it when I get the release announcement. Unfortunately the update bot doesn't really work because of how the source and binary packages are coupled, but update.nix does usually work.11:34:32
@corngood:corngood.comCorngood

Mine is here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/461246

It would be great to get the update bot working. It actually does manage to update the binary packages most of the time, but we currently build the top level packages (e.g. dotnet-sdk_8) as a composite of the binary SDK and source-built runtime. This means that you need to update them at the same time, or it'll fail a version assert.

So like:

99acf9463aef dotnetCorePackages.dotnet_8.vmr: 8.0.21 -> 8.0.22
9cc88eb04523 dotnetCorePackages.sdk_8_0-bin: 8.0.415 -> 8.0.416

It'

13:59:42
@corngood:corngood.comCorngood *

Mine is here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/461246

It would be great to get the update bot working. It actually does manage to update the binary packages most of the time, but we currently build the top level packages (e.g. dotnet-sdk_8) as a composite of the binary SDK and source-built runtime. This means that you need to update them at the same time, or it'll fail a version assert.

So like:

99acf9463aef dotnetCorePackages.dotnet_8.vmr: 8.0.21 -> 8.0.22
9cc88eb04523 dotnetCorePackages.sdk_8_0-bin: 8.0.415 -> 8.0.416
13:59:56
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuel running nixpkgs-review now 14:01:48
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodI had a brief look for examples of update scripts that deal with this sort of coupling, but I didn't find anything obvious. One method would be to make the composite SDK have an update script that calls both of the child ones.14:02:02
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuel Dang, that's a chonky rebuild, pulling ≈20GB from the cache, that's ≈60GB uncompressed 14:06:17
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodBuilding all this stuff is too expensive for nixpkgs-review-gha, so I'm not sure if the update bot would even be able to do it... I'm also running a review btw, on x86_64-linux.14:06:42
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodAnd then I usually do a darwin one from the community builder after that.14:07:02
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuelI'm running on an 8C/16T ryzen server and it still takes a long time every update 🙃14:08:19
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuelMostly due to a full webkit build somewhere down the dependency graph14:09:34
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodVMR 10 already failed for me... Looks like some sort of change to the output structure :| Why is there a webkit build? Something that's currently broken on master?14:10:55
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuelNo webkit was last time, this time it's just opencv for now14:16:42
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuelimage.png
Download image.png
14:16:47
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuelStill annoying but not that bad14:17:07
@gorillaman43:matrix.orgqsevers23 joined the room.14:20:50
@gorillaman43:matrix.orgqsevers23Thanks for getting the new dotnet releases wrapped up, running nixpkgs-review on aarch64-darwin now14:24:04
@gorillaman43:matrix.orgqsevers23 changed their display name from gorillaman43 to qsevers23.14:24:24
@corngood:corngood.comCorngoodVMR failed because it now outputs dotnet-sdk-10.0.100-rtm.25523.111-linux-x64, but the sdkVersion field in release.json is just '10.0.100'. I guess in the past this always matched, ugh15:46:15
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuel Had to pause the build for a while, but I'm now building the rest of the packages 17:16:20
@samuel:mnzn.devSamuel Ok, the builds are done. I think most of the stuff not related to the vmr failure built correctly. 19:09:42
@corngood:corngood.comCorngood I'm still working on the buildid thing. If I remove the 'officialBuildId' from the manifest, I get e.g. dotnet-sdk-10.0.100-dev-linux-x64.tar.gz, but it's still sticking that -dev in there. This wasn't a problem in the preview builds because the manifest had the full suffix on the versions 19:19:56

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9