Nix + dotnet | 128 Members | |
| 23 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 18 May 2025 | ||
* it would be better to rollForward=latestPatch (aka 9.0.1xx) to still receive bug fixes assuming avoiding the feature band bump was the intention | 22:53:01 | |
| Are you saying in respect to what Upstream should do, or what I should do for my Nix packaging? | 22:53:28 | |
| what upstream should do | 22:53:50 | |
| you probably should just ^ | 22:53:57 | |
| global.json doesn't really matter because you specify the sdk version in nix anyway | 22:54:26 | |
and if the build really breaks (or anything other unwanted) on 9.0.2xx, just specify sdk_9_0_1xx in nix | 22:55:07 | |
| I imagine this would still be an issue with
| 22:55:26 | |
* and if the build really breaks (or anything other unwanted happens) on 9.0.2xx, just specify sdk_9_0_1xx in nix | 22:55:31 | |
| Cool, thank you very much! | 22:55:33 | |
you'd specify sdk_9_0_1xx then, yeah | 22:56:16 | |
| Thank you for the thoughts! | 22:57:15 | |
fyi (at least for now) the 1xx feature band is supported for the whole .net version lifetime | 22:57:15 | |
while 2xx and 3xx get EOLed until you land on 4xx | 22:57:27 | |
| That seems interesting. | 22:57:59 | |
because source build officially supports only 1xx | 22:58:36 | |
| so newer feature bands are MS binaries only | 22:58:51 | |
| * so later feature bands are MS binaries only | 22:58:58 | |
So this seems to have worked fine. Thank you again for the thoughts! | 23:10:35 | |
| That's very interesting. Thank you for the thoughts! | 23:10:47 | |
*
So this seems to have worked fine. Thank you again for the thoughts! | 23:11:00 | |
you probably want postPatch, but yeah, lgtm | 23:23:03 | |
Oh, do you have a specific thought on why I should be using postPatch instead of patchPhase for this? | 23:23:37 | |
I'm also doing more in patchPhase than just what I put above, so if you think moving that rm to postPatch instead is good then I'll probably just move the whole block. | 23:24:50 | |
* I'm also doing more in patchPhase than just what I put above, so if you think moving that rm to postPatch instead is good then I'll probably just rename the whole block. | 23:24:58 | |
overriding patchPhase will break patches iirc | 23:24:58 | |
Eh fair, I'll probably split it into two commits (updating and then swapping to postPatch) - Thanks for the thoughts! | 23:26:04 | |
| 27 May 2025 | ||
| 19:17:22 | ||
| 28 May 2025 | ||
| 15:18:28 | ||
| 15:21:57 | ||
| 29 May 2025 | ||
| Hey, I'm here again to cause issues. :P
| 02:14:32 | |