| 22 Apr 2026 |
 K900 | Probably want to talk to SBOM people about this | 16:11:12 |
 Emma [it/its] | i was thinking ie. the path to the deps.json and attrs/attrnames for projectReferences (which i guess would have similar problems as the SBOM team, yeah) | 16:12:09 |
| Emma [it/its] | (particularly, im just reflecting on my own struggles of maintaining deps.json files in a monorepo) | 16:15:03 |
| Emma [it/its] | * (particularly, im just reflecting on my own struggles of maintaining deps.json files in a monorepo, for which im currently maintaining my own wrapper for buildDotnetModule...) | 16:15:19 |
| Emma [it/its] | hm, no room seems to be listed on the nixos.org room dir, got a link for me? | 16:16:04 |
| K900 | I think it's just #sbom:nixos.org? | 16:16:40 |
| K900 | I'm not in it | 16:16:41 |
| Emma [it/its] | matrix:r/sbom:nixos.org let's see | 16:16:55 |
| Emma [it/its] | doesnt seem to be valid | 16:17:28 |
| Emma [it/its] | 
Download clipboard.png | 16:17:38 |
 ghpzin | Probably this #nixpkgs-sbom:matrix.org:
https://matrix.to/#/#nixpkgs-sbom:matrix.org | 19:00:47 |
| Emma [it/its] | well, now ive realised my idiocy, im already in that room despite not being able to find it in the space at all ^^' | 19:01:47 |
| Emma [it/its] | (and getting no search results for sbom in my client...) | 19:02:04 |
| Emma [it/its] | hm, fetch-deps seems to fail if i define a non string property...? | 19:44:06 |
| Emma [it/its] | error:
… while evaluating an expression to select 'drvPath' on it
at «internal»:1:552:
… while evaluating strict
at «internal»:1:552:
(stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full trace)
error: cannot coerce a set to a string: { derivations = «thunk»; names = «thunk»; }
note: trace involved the following derivations:
derivation 'Spacebar.Cdn-1.0.0-preview.20260421-191102-fetch-deps'
derivation 'Spacebar.Cdn-1.0.0-preview.20260421-191102'
(for context: i added a custom namespaced attribute to the drv called __sbDmProjectReferences) | 19:44:46 |
| K900 | You have to put it at passthru | 19:45:44 |
| K900 | Otherwise it tries to convert it to an environment variable | 19:45:52 |
| Emma [it/its] | d'oh | 19:45:58 |
| 13 Oct 2022 |
|  Winter (she/her) joined the room. | 17:56:01 |
| 12 Nov 2022 |
|  321, jiayou! joined the room. | 09:31:11 |
| 321, jiayou! left the room. | 09:31:52 |
| 16 Nov 2022 |
|  omlet joined the room. | 20:33:57 |
| 25 Nov 2022 |
|  raphi changed their profile picture. | 19:41:53 |
| 1 Dec 2022 |
|  hexa changed their display name from hexa to hexa (22.11 now). | 13:08:55 |
| hexa changed their display name from hexa (22.11 now) to hexa. | 14:38:43 |
| 12 Jan 2023 |
|  daniel joined the room. | 12:58:04 |
| daniel | Anyone who has some experience with packaging a .NET-project using flakes? All prior art I’ve found seems to use the legacy way. | 13:02:55 |
| Winter (she/her) | In reply to @daniel:nopemail.org
Anyone who has some experience with packaging a .NET-project using flakes? All prior art I’ve found seems to use the legacy way. flakes are the same way as the "legacy way," all flakes help with is exposing the package.
what trouble are you running into? | 14:23:13 |
| daniel | In reply to @winterqt:nixos.dev
flakes are the same way as the "legacy way," all flakes help with is exposing the package.
what trouble are you running into? How to "expose"/run fetch-deps | 14:24:38 |
| Winter (she/her) | just do nix build .#whateverPackage.fetch-deps | 14:25:11 |
