| 10 Jan 2025 |
 Corngood | * then you're using packages from nuget.org or something. maybe if you had fetch-deps use the master avalonia package? | 17:06:50 |
 6pak | but different outputs would solve it with no negatives right? (assuming they work how I think they do) | 17:06:50 |
| 6pak | oh you mean a list in consuming projects? | 17:07:27 |
| Corngood | it wouldn't be different from having separate derivations | 17:07:29 |
| 6pak | you would build avalonia twice | 17:07:44 |
| 6pak | * you would build avalonia once | 17:07:54 |
| Corngood | oh I see. I guess it would save storing the monolithic output, but that wouldn't be used directly by anything | 17:08:45 |
| 6pak | unless with the copy approach you would make the monolith uncacheable, which also works I guess? | 17:08:52 |
| 6pak | but it feels like the outputs thing was literally designed for this | 17:09:16 |
