| 24 Dec 2024 |
 6pak | so perf wise rec might be better I guess | 02:32:25 |
 GGG | I don't know if it actually makes any difference honestly | 02:33:34 |
| 6pak | eval speed is unbearably slow no matter what -_- | 02:33:54 |
| GGG | I was just afraid it was being redundant, but if it isn't then there's no point, you can ignore it | 02:33:55 |
| GGG | In reply to @6pak:matrix.org
eval speed is unbearably slow no matter what -_- Yeah, unfortunately eval is something that's really awfully slow in nix | 02:34:11 |
| GGG | I dread every time I have to rebuild my config, it takes literal minutes | 02:34:30 |
| 6pak | yeah | 02:35:03 |
 Emma [it/its] | same here, wish it wasnt that way | 02:42:39 |
| GGG | Here's hoping the multithreaded eval PR goes faster | 02:50:09 |
| GGG | @corngood:corngood.com guess we'll need to re-run the update scripts for all versions even if they're the same: https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/336 | 02:50:44 |
| GGG | I'll get a PR up and running for that | 02:56:42 |
| GGG | You need to adjust yours as well @6pak:matrix.org: | 02:56:54 |
| GGG | * You need to adjust yours as well
@6pak:matrix.org | 02:57:01 |
| GGG | also, thinking of it | 03:58:40 |
| GGG | we should separate test-only nuget packages from actual program nuget packages | 03:58:53 |
| GGG | cause currently they remain in the closure, I think | 03:59:00 |
| GGG | or are they just thrown away since they're only buildPackages and not runtimePackages? | 03:59:22 |
| GGG | Seems only the source builds are affected by this, the binary SDKs/runtimes use download.visualstudio.microsoft.com. | 04:33:06 |
| Emma [it/its] | doesnt the announcement say they already migrated some stuff anyways | 04:38:28 |
| GGG | no, they haven't yet | 04:38:41 |
| GGG | they will be doing it | 04:38:44 |
| GGG | but they haven't | 04:38:47 |
 Corngood | In reply to @gggkiller:matrix.org
or are they just thrown away since they're only buildPackages and not runtimePackages? They shouldn't be referenced in the outputs.
We don't even symlink libraries from packages at the moment. | 13:21:21 |
| 25 Dec 2024 |
 Emmanuel Genga | How does fetch-deps work after running the result, is it supposed to replace the current nugetDeps file with a new one or does it output the code and you have to copy it? | 10:21:57 |
| Corngood | In reply to @genga898:matrix.org
How does fetch-deps work after running the result, is it supposed to replace the current nugetDeps file with a new one or does it output the code and you have to copy it? It's supposed to replace it | 11:40:40 |
| Emmanuel Genga | In reply to @corngood:corngood.com
It's supposed to replace it Ooh, I thought I had an issue but the package I'm trying to create depends on a release candidate version of avalonia so it keeps failing | 11:43:31 |
 Daniel | Hello! Does anyone here have a working nix shell configuration for dotnet 8? dotnet run works very easily with the definition of DOTNET_ROOT but when I have a built assembly and just want to start it, I always get an error that libhostfxr.so is not found! | 20:24:32 |
| Emmanuel Genga | Would it be ok to try and override the avalonia package or I may encounter more issues trying to do that? | 20:41:37 |
| GGG | In reply to @docbrown101:matrix.org
Hello! Does anyone here have a working nix shell configuration for dotnet 8? dotnet run works very easily with the definition of DOTNET_ROOT but when I have a built assembly and just want to start it, I always get an error that libhostfxr.so is not found! I have these in my home manager config: https://github.com/GGG-KILLER/nixos-configs/blob/master/hosts%2Fsora%2Fusers%2Fggg%2Fdefault.nix#L175-L178 | 20:46:15 |
| 6pak | the bottom two look cursed, why do you need those for? | 20:47:13 |
