!djTaTBQyWEPRQxrPTb:nixos.org

Nixpkgs Architecture Team

228 Members
https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture, weekly public meetings on Wednesday 15:00-16:00 UTC at https://meet.jit.si/nixpkgs-architecture53 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
27 Sep 2023
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilThat's kind of what https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/256788 is about17:49:30
@piegames:matrix.org@piegames:matrix.orgI must admit that I am completely lost in the issue text, after reading it twice17:51:02
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilYeah sorry I admit it's really hard to read..17:51:15
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilJust a wall of text 😅17:51:24
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilFor the nixcon presentation it was fun trying to come up with visual explanations of things, I'll try the same here :)18:08:28
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil piegames: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/256788#issuecomment-1737965650 19:33:48
@piegames:matrix.org@piegames:matrix.orghttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/256788#issuecomment-1737979351 yeah I think this was the actual cause for my confusion19:48:32
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil Yeah, well I'm glad I was able to explain it, it's useful specific to nixpkgs-check-by-name, but a CI retrigger is a decent fix the other general problem :) 19:49:34
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil * Yeah, well I'm glad I was able to explain it, it's useful specific to nixpkgs-check-by-name, but a CI retrigger is a decent fix for the other general problem :) 19:49:44
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilOh and I guess this could also be useful if it's too expensive to re-trigger the CI check for all affected PR's19:52:08
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil (not the case for nixpkgs-check-by-name) 19:52:22
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilKind of nice how this approach allows a gradual rollout of a new CI check though. And you can kind of control the amount of the rollout based on how quickly you fix the base branch when the new check starts failing on it.19:58:30
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil * Kind of nice how this approach allows a gradual rollout of a new CI check without using any extra resources though. And you can kind of control the amount of the rollout based on how quickly you fix the base branch when the new check starts failing on it.19:58:46
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilNice, the RFC 140 tool prevented the double addition of a package: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/25756521:12:28
28 Sep 2023
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilThis is fairly small, kind of neat and self-contained, reviews appreciated: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/25773500:06:25
2 Oct 2023
@atra1n:matrix.org@atra1n:matrix.org joined the room.01:42:33
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil Here's the current plan for the RFC 140 migration, I'd like to talk about that in tomorrows NAT meeting and optionally schedule a longer call if it needs to be discussed further: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/258650 (cc Robert Hensing (roberth) John Ericson tomberek growpotkin ( Alex Ameen ) DavHau phaer) 20:30:22
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilIf anybody has items they want to talk about, please add them to the agenda in the meeting notes here: https://pad.lassul.us/uIi7xeSJTW6LJUEHulZgVQ?edit20:32:48
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil * If anybody has other items they want to talk about, please add them to the agenda in the meeting notes here: https://pad.lassul.us/uIi7xeSJTW6LJUEHulZgVQ?edit20:32:55
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberekI will be on a plane. ✈️20:55:37
@hsngrmpf:matrix.orgDavHauI'm not sure if I can make it tomorrow22:21:15
3 Oct 2023
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil Ping John Ericson growpotkin ( Alex Ameen ) phaer DavHau 13:01:40
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilMeeting now in https://meet.jit.si/nixpkgs-architecture, meeting notes: https://pad.lassul.us/uIi7xeSJTW6LJUEHulZgVQ?edit13:03:36
@growpotkin:matrix.orgGrowpotkin2023-10-03-080326_503x673_scrot.png
Download 2023-10-03-080326_503x673_scrot.png
13:03:47
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericson I'm sorry infinisil I slept poorly on and off for a long time and just woke up. I did look at the PRs a bit yesterday and the test both state and compare approach looked rock solid (I kind of want that for all CI checks now!) 13:47:59
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilNo problem, glad you approve of it! :D13:49:08
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn EricsonHopefully next one I am not sick and not jetlagged and can join properly!13:59:06
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil John Ericson: If you want to discuss it we can also just schedule an ad-hoc call :) 14:17:19
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn EricsonI don't think I have to much to add, just sorry about being an AWOL team member! 14:17:55
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn EricsonI can go review these things async and slap some approvals on them14:18:06

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9