| 17 Jul 2023 |
 infinisil | It's a bit too unspecific for me! | 22:25:23 |
| infinisil | So far there's two votes for each of the first two options, out of which I like "not-all-packages-anymore.nix" the most, probably will go for that :) | 22:26:59 |
| 18 Jul 2023 |
 hexa |
Stop calling me!
| 00:03:16 |
| hexa | although that feels like it has the wrong ring to it | 00:03:46 |
| hexa |
Only bespoke-packages.nix left. Evactuate the ship!
| 00:04:05 |
| hexa | *
Only bespoke-packages.nix left. Evactuate the sinking ship!
| 00:04:46 |
 figsoda |
all-packages.nix? some-outliers.nix!
| 01:04:12 |
|  @johannes.kirschbauer:scs.ems.host joined the room. | 15:28:29 |
| infinisil | Opened this separate PR for the RFC 140 implementation: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/244187 | 16:36:22 |
| infinisil | * Opened this separate PR to split up the RFC 140 implementation: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/244187 | 16:36:43 |
 tea | Why is that backported to 23.05? | 17:08:37 |
 K900 (deprecated) | Because if we don't backport it automatic backports will not work | 17:10:22 |
| tea | oh | 17:17:34 |
| tea | I think I get it | 17:17:39 |
| infinisil | It will be not-all-packages-anymore.nix :) | 18:52:11 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | You won't believe it's not all-packages.nix | 19:00:53 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | I'll stop | 19:00:55 |
| 21 Jul 2023 |
|  @willpower3309:matrix.org joined the room. | 15:32:04 |
| 24 Jul 2023 |
| K900 (deprecated) changed their profile picture. | 15:45:00 |
| K900 (deprecated) changed their profile picture. | 15:46:07 |
| 25 Jul 2023 |
|  @federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 01:57:10 |
|  lassulus changed their profile picture. | 15:19:32 |
|  ncfavier changed their profile picture. | 16:43:16 |
|  pbsds changed their display name from pbsds to pbsds (UTC+1). | 19:03:43 |
| 27 Jul 2023 |
|  ribosomerocker joined the room. | 03:04:39 |
| 1 Aug 2023 |
|  Christina Sørensen joined the room. | 08:29:44 |
| 2 Aug 2023 |
|  @adam:valkor.net left the room. | 23:48:37 |
| 5 Aug 2023 |
 phaer | Hello! As we are suspending the pkg-modules WG (https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture/pkgs-modules/pull/32), I'd like to apply for the NAT as outlined in https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture/#joining-the-team.
I am primarily interested in the module systems, but also curios where https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture/issues/issues/5 will take us after RFC-140 :) My github account is @phaer, mail in profile.
Not entirely sure about the new meeting schedule, now that it's monthly meeting? | 07:48:37 |
|  fpletz joined the room. | 12:01:05 |
| 6 Aug 2023 |
 DavHau | Hello, I would like to become a member of the NAT.
As maintainer of dream2nix, improving the architecture of nixpkgs is in my interest because much of my project is based on things in nixpkgs and the quality of integration and UX depends on the architecture of nixpkgs. Given that my work is focused on alternative ways to use nix outside the nixpkgs bubble, I think I can bring a valuable perspective to the team.
While my work in the NAT itself is not directly sponsored by a company, dream2nix is sponsored by NLNet and customer projects, and therefore I have an ongoing interest being involved here, as this potentially simplifies my work.
Specifically I was recently focusing on alternative uses of the nixos module system, and would like to continue working on this while getting feedback from the team.
| 13:55:23 |
