| 14 Jun 2023 |
K900 (deprecated) | I really want this to be a thing | 21:17:27 |
K900 (deprecated) | And have no time for anything :( | 21:17:47 |
infinisil | I think we should try to create streamlined process for creating WG's, it worked decently well for the packages modules WG one: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/working-group-member-search-module-system-for-packages/26574 | 21:19:38 |
| 15 Jun 2023 |
| pneumatic joined the room. | 16:40:07 |
| 16 Jun 2023 |
@piegames:matrix.org | So, what's the timeline for RFC 140? Is it ready to be marked ready for review again? | 08:03:41 |
@piegames:matrix.org | Also I think the implementation PR can already be changed to by-name, as this seems to be our best bet right now | 08:04:58 |
infinisil | piegames: I'm busy until Monday, but I'll try to get the update done today. Note also the last NAT meeting where there was agreement to change it to by-name. So we just need confirmation from all shepherds | 09:01:58 |
@piegames:matrix.org | Count that as a +1 from me | 09:03:08 |
phaer | +1 from me as well, just in case matrix reactions aren't enough :) | 10:31:30 |
phaer | Reminder: There will be a presentation on https://github.com/DavHau/drv-parts by DavHau in todays pkg-modules meeting at 13h UTC (15h CEST) - in ~2,5h
The meeting is open to everyone at https://meet.jit.si/wg-pkgs-modules, and infinisil scheduled a YoutTube stream at https://youtube.com/live/FmaFOlKRUKw
| 10:35:15 |
@syphoxy:matrix.org | thanks for the UTC. | 11:05:17 |
infinisil | phaer j-k growpotkin ( Alex Ameen ) piegames: I updated the RFC, can you approve it on GitHub again if you agree with the changes? See https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/140#issuecomment-1594625831 and the latest commit | 12:51:03 |
infinisil | phaer: (I was thinking with a GitHub approving review :P) | 12:53:47 |
phaer | okay okay ;) | 12:54:08 |
phaer | I'll do the clicking | 12:54:21 |
infinisil | Just to make it easier for the steering committee to verify it :) | 12:54:25 |
infinisil | (or anybody really, not just the committee) | 12:54:51 |
phaer | yes, i agree it's nicer to see it right at the top | 12:55:44 |
infinisil | GitHub doesn't invalidate old reviews when changes were done though, so the old approvals are still visible at the top, but the latest history entry in the PR makes it verifiable :) | 12:56:52 |
Sandro 🐧 | IIRC there is a roadmap ticket to change that | 13:28:09 |
infinisil | growpotkin ( Alex Ameen ) piegames: I'll be gone in 1.5 hours, but if you both also do a GitHub approving review of https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/140, you can call for another FCP, we'll probably have to wait until the steering committee meets the next time until it starts though | 14:52:54 |
infinisil | * growpotkin ( Alex Ameen ) piegames: I'll be gone in 1.5 hours, but if you both also do a GitHub approving review of https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/140, you can call for another FCP. We'll probably have to wait until the steering committee meets the next time until it starts though | 14:53:15 |
@piegames:matrix.org | infinisil you need to un-draft the PR first | 16:50:59 |
@piegames:matrix.org | Also I'm not sure whether we'll have to wait for the steering committee | 16:51:21 |
infinisil | In reply to @piegames:matrix.org infinisil you need to un-draft the PR first Ah right. I'm on mobile now though until Monday, and the mobile interface doesn't seem to have an option to mark it as ready 🙃 | 16:57:23 |
infinisil | Anyways I'll do that next week | 16:57:31 |
@piegames:matrix.org | noooo | 16:57:37 |
@piegames:matrix.org | And if you let the phone render the desktop version? | 16:57:48 |
infinisil | This isn't blocking | 16:57:51 |
infinisil | In reply to @piegames:matrix.org And if you let the phone render the desktop version? I might need by yubikey for 2fa, which I didn't bring of course 🤦♂️ | 16:59:17 |