| 14 Jun 2023 |
 John Ericson | yeah | 16:40:22 |
| John Ericson | on one hand, the hting that was added to nix-env before is bad | 16:40:28 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | nix-env is bad. What thing was added? | 16:40:39 |
| John Ericson | on the other hand, this should probably all be nixpkgs tool, not nix-env | 16:40:40 |
| John Ericson | https://github.com/NixOS/nix/commit/cd933b22d2041b7efc348dcc09ff255967ffc663 that is bad | 16:41:05 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | oh, yeah. Nixpkgs should just fix name imo | 16:41:35 |
| John Ericson | fix name? | 16:41:45 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | I tried it when working on cleanAttrs, didn't break much | 16:41:56 |
| John Ericson | make it pname? | 16:41:57 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | make it just the package name | 16:41:59 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | yeah | 16:42:02 |
| John Ericson | what ends up being the derivation name? | 16:42:22 |
| John Ericson | name-version? | 16:42:23 |
| John Ericson | * name + "-" + version? | 16:42:34 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | exactly. It matches the store path name part | 16:42:48 |
 hexa | 
Download image.png | 16:43:00 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | because that's what builtins.derviation cares about | 16:43:07 |
| hexa | as long as this situation would get fixed along the way I'll take it | 16:43:17 |
| hexa | the first package is actually called solanum, the second package is some gnome extension in some namespace | 16:43:41 |
| hexa | but yeah, silly pname parsing | 16:43:50 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | can't promise that attr names and package names will match (they won't) but these things all sound very solveable | 16:44:21 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | though I'll acknowledge that some people might wonder where their version number went | 16:44:52 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | don't make me tap the sign ;) https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/6507 | 16:45:42 |
| John Ericson | https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4955 this also is making me realize that Nixpkgs Command is very important | 17:04:42 |
| John Ericson | and could perhaps merit a working group | 17:04:47 |
| John Ericson | though I suppose one can always just make a thing, and then it grows organically | 17:05:00 |
 K900 (deprecated) | I really want this to be a thing | 21:17:27 |
| K900 (deprecated) | And have no time for anything :( | 21:17:47 |
 infinisil | I think we should try to create streamlined process for creating WG's, it worked decently well for the packages modules WG one: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/working-group-member-search-module-system-for-packages/26574 | 21:19:38 |
| 15 Jun 2023 |
|  pneumatic joined the room. | 16:40:07 |
