| 9 Jun 2023 |
infinisil | Considering that we have a potentially better alternative now and more people think unit isn't great, I think that's reason enough to cancel FCP for now, discuss this to completion, then do another FCP once settled. | 19:54:56 |
Robert Hensing (roberth) | Oh looks like I wasn't the first to think of it https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/140#discussion_r1224642417 | 19:57:27 |
infinisil | By about 30 minutes haha | 19:58:36 |
infinisil | So easy to miss these threads.. | 19:58:56 |
infinisil | Plug for https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/138 | 19:59:02 |
Robert Hensing (roberth) | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org Considering that we have a potentially better alternative now and more people think unit isn't great, I think that's reason enough to cancel FCP for now, discuss this to completion, then do another FCP once settled. I feel like FCP should allow a rename to happen without a restart, but maybe I'm wrong | 19:59:10 |
Robert Hensing (roberth) | repos are for suckers who aren't telepathic | 19:59:50 |
Robert Hensing (roberth) | clearly I pulled by-name from someone else's brain without reading anything | 20:00:09 |
infinisil | I wouldn't think so. The naming is an integral part of it, and this potentially better alternative was just talked about for like the past hour, not enough time for the community to take another look at the proposal until FCP ends (tomorrow..) | 20:00:24 |
Robert Hensing (roberth) | Oh right, didn't realise time is that fast. Yeah 1 day is definitely too short | 20:01:03 |
infinisil | Also, I don't really want to have to deal with changing this aspect of the RFC at this hour, and the potential fallout for not canceling FCP for such a change | 20:01:36 |
Robert Hensing (roberth) | Yeah, there's no hurry | 20:01:55 |
infinisil | I'll make a short comment linking to this Matrix thread and that FCP is canceled for now (which I should be allowed to do as the author :P) | 20:02:33 |
K900 | I just want to shout out the fact that the FCP ended up working | 20:05:10 |
K900 | So we are doing something right | 20:05:39 |
@piegames:matrix.org | In reply to @k900:0upti.me I just want to shout out the fact that the FCP ended up working Honestly, I'm not that happy with how it went. Will write something in the meta-RFC Discourse thread tomorrow or so | 20:08:51 |
infinisil | K900: I mean, it ended up with just bikeshedding over one of the simplest aspects of the RFC, while the meat of the RFC was left without any comments 😅 | 20:09:15 |
K900 | I mean, I definitely wish it happened earlier | 20:09:31 |
infinisil | Did the FCP work or distract from more important parts? | 20:09:33 |
K900 | But I think it did work | 20:09:46 |
@piegames:matrix.org | Also, I'd like to have an RFC room even for RFCs from tge Architecture team. Not sure if it makes sense for 140 this late, bit for all the others | 20:09:47 |
K900 | I don't think it's important whether the issue is "important" or not | 20:10:11 |
infinisil | piegames: Was there a problem with using this room? | 20:10:23 |
K900 | If people were willing to call off the FCP over it, it's important to them | 20:10:24 |
@piegames:matrix.org | In reply to @k900:0upti.me I mean, I definitely wish it happened earlier That's my main complaint, yeah. Having two weeks of almost silence and then on the last day suddenly it explodes | 20:10:41 |
infinisil | Eh I don't think that's a problem, FCP is 10 days, people are busy, you can complain at any time | 20:11:09 |
infinisil | * Eh I don't think that's a problem, FCP is 10 days, people are busy, one can complain at any time | 20:11:34 |
@piegames:matrix.org | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org piegames: Was there a problem with using this room? sy's insecurity reminded me of this. But also separation of concerns, people might want to follow one topic but not the other | 20:11:49 |
infinisil | Fair enough. I don't think it's a big problem in this specific case since the RFC is the only thing that's been going on for a while | 20:12:42 |
@piegames:matrix.org | Yes. But for the future | 20:13:39 |