Nixpkgs Architecture Team | 221 Members | |
| https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture, weekly public meetings on Wednesday 15:00-16:00 UTC at https://meet.jit.si/nixpkgs-architecture | 52 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Mar 2024 | ||
| Agreed. I'd never want to make decisions in such a private room, and indeed we never did | 17:44:10 | |
| (well the NAT can't really make a decision anyways since it has no authority anyways, would be more important if that wasn't the case) | 17:44:37 | |
| The Nix Community is nothing without contributors, and contributors want to feel like they have some agency in how they can participate. Maybe I'm just still upset over srid getting banned over opposing the prescribed moderation decisions. Meanwhile other members of the community can hop into matrix channels, tell 3+ people to F-off, and not receive a slap on the wrist. | 17:44:48 | |
In reply to @infinisil:matrix.orgOh well I guess that private room was used to decide over new members | 17:46:58 | |
| Anyways I'll soon share the logs of that room, it's really not very exciting. In summary it's:
| 17:48:09 | |
| * Anyways I'll soon share the logs of that room, it's really not very exciting. In summary it's:
| 17:48:31 | |
In reply to @jonringer:matrix.orginviting bigots, like srid, who was banned, into your community is a massive contribution barrier to the people they are bigoted against. I'm not willing to debate this or rehash the moderation decision and this is not the channel to further discuss this, I just have to point out that this is something you are very notably missing. | 17:50:23 | |
| This is not an appropriate place for this discussion. Please stop | 17:50:59 | |
| * The Nix Community is nothing without contributors, and contributors want to feel like they have some agency in how they can participate. Maybe I'm just still upset over srid getting banned over opposing the prescribed moderation decisions. Meanwhile other members of the community can hop into matrix channels, tell 3+ people to F-off, and not receive a slap on the wrist. And from a community member standpoint, it's like witnessing a car crash, seeing a few people get hauled off. One member miraculously survives, and the other person some how died of scratches. | 17:51:01 | |
Where is an appropriate place? Direct correspondence with the Moderation team is for moderation concerns, I think this is a community concern. | 17:51:54 | |
| Not sure tbh. Maybe Discourse? Maybe #platform-governance:nixos.org? | 17:52:49 | |
| Or #moderation:nixos.org? | 17:53:00 | |
In reply to @infinisil:matrix.orgPreferably not. That channel is better kept low traffic for time-critical reports | 17:53:26 | |
Pretty sure srid did this, and got banned.
Last time I was told to F off | 17:53:53 | |
*
Pretty sure srid did this, and got banned.
Last time I was told to F off. And piegames stopped conversation under threat of moderation action | 17:54:43 | |
| jonringer: That is a valid discussion, but I agree that this specific forum is wrong. piegames where would you like it to be? | 17:56:02 | |
| I think #platform-governance:nixos.org would be most appropriate then | 17:56:17 | |
In reply to @jonringer:matrix.orgThis is a heavy distortion of what actually happened at best. Anyways, I don't think that I'm sufficiently qualified here and have pinged the other moderators. | 17:58:32 | |
All I have to go on is that post-fallout chatter, and what srid released publicly. There's was little transparency to clarify the reasoning behind the ban. | 18:00:26 | |
| Anyway, to prevent further noise in this thread. I'll stop my responses. | 18:01:43 | |
| If you start discussing this elsewhere you can post a link here for reference :) | 18:02:11 | |
| One of the hard part of getting large projects done is to find the right people. People you get along with and that are going to augment you. One bad apple can easily disrupt a project. That bad apple might be a good fit for other people so it's not a judgement. But it makes sense to me to select people in private. | 18:10:40 | |
| 18:14:08 | ||
| For having joined NixOS when there was less people than this channel has, … sometimes you just deal we who is there. But I do agree that when you have the luxury of making a cohesive team which can work well together this can yield a better outcome, but I am not sure this can easily be judged without already knowing the persons. | 18:15:04 | |
| * For having joined NixOS when there was less people than this channel has, … sometimes you just deal we who is there. But I do agree that when you have the luxury of making a cohesive team which can work well together this can yield a better outcome, however I am not sure this can easily be judged without already knowing the persons. | 18:15:30 | |
| 18:15:43 | ||
| (and I should have stopped commenting as this room is about Nixpkgs Architecture) | 18:16:12 | |